Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35124864›Full record

ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2022

Estimating posttraumatic stress disorder severity in the presence of differential item functioning across populations, comorbidities, and interview measures: Introduction to Project Harmony.

Antonio A Morgan-López, Denise A Hien, Tanya C Saraiya, Lissette M Saavedra, Sonya B Norman, Therese K Killeen, Tracy L Simpson, Skye Fitzpatrick, Katherine L Mills, Lesia M Ruglass and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Severe PTSD or just PTSD?European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Hidden Psychometric Model Underlying thePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Antonio A Morgan-LópezRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4706-9964
Denise A HienCenter for Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University-Piscataway, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Tanya C SaraiyaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8910-947X
Lissette M SaavedraRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Sonya B NormanVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
Therese K KilleenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Tracy L SimpsonVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Skye FitzpatrickDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Katherine L MillsSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Lesia M RuglassDepartment of Psychology, City College of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Sudie E BackDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-8737
Teresa López-CastroDepartment of Psychology, City College of New York, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-6329
Consortium on Addiction, Stress and Trauma (CAST)RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USCity College of New York · USRTI International · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of California San Diego · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · USYork University · CA

Funding

DRUG ABUSE TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007288 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Christopher W Cowan, Rachel Penrod-Martin · 1991 to 2026
$11.8M
Clinical Scientists Training Program in Addictions at MUSCK12DA031794 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Kevin M. Gray, AIMEE L MCRAE-CLARK · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research at MUSCK12HD055885 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCGINTY, JACQUELINE F. · 2007 to 2021
$7.2M
Translational Research Training on Addictions for Racial/Ethnic MinoritiesR25DA035161 · NIDA · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI DENISE AIMEE HIEN, Lesia Monique Ruglass · 2013 to 2026
$4.4M
Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data for PTSD/AODsR01AA025853 · NIAAA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI HIEN, DENISE AIMEE, MORGAN-LOPEZ, ANTONIO A · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025853NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055885NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA031794NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA035161NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple factor analytic and item response theory studies have shown that items/symptoms vary in their relative clinical weights in structured interview measures for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite these findings, the use of total scores, which treat symptoms as though they are equally weighted, predominates in practice, with the consequence of undermining the precision of clinical decision-making. We conducted an integrative data analysis (IDA) study to harmonize PTSD structured interview data (i.e., recoding of items to a common symptom metric) from 25 studies (total N = 2,568). We aimed to identify (a) measurement noninvariance/differential item functioning (MNI/DIF) across multiple populations, psychiatric comorbidities, and interview measures simultaneously and (b) differences in inferences regarding underlying PTSD severity between scale scores estimated using moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA) and a total score analog model (TSA). Several predictors of MNI/DIF impacted effect size differences in underlying severity across scale scoring methods. Notably, we observed MNI/DIF substantial enough to bias inferences on underlying PTSD severity for two groups: African Americans and incarcerated women. The findings highlight two issues raised elsewhere in the PTSD psychometrics literature: (a) bias in characterizing underlying PTSD severity and individual-level treatment outcomes when the psychometric model underlying total scores fails to fit the data and (b) higher latent severity scores, on average, when using DSM-5 (net of MNI/DIF) criteria, by which multiple factors (e.g., Criterion A discordance across DSM editions, changes to the number/type of symptom clusters, changes to the symptoms themselves) may have impacted severity scoring for some patients.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticComorbidityDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID35124864
PMCPMC9844237
OpenAlexW4210612860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.