Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35124756›Full record

ReviewCell and tissue banking2022

Preservation of corneal stromal lenticule: review.

Martina Nemcokova, Jakub Dite, Yun Min Klimesova, Magdalena Netukova, Pavel Studeny

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cell and tissue banking, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martina NemcokovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic. martina.nemcokova@fnkv.cz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-7956
Jakub DiteDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic.
Yun Min KlimesovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic.
Magdalena NetukovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel StudenyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 350321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal stromal lenticule is a part of corneal stroma, which can be created by manual dissection, by femtosecond laser from the donor cornea, but chiefly it is a waste product of a refractive procedure ReLex SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction). Corneal lenticule has a huge potential in corneal surgery. In recent years, many studies have been published to show the possibility to use this tissue to treat corneal defects, as well as in refractive surgery. Thanks to the quantity of lenticules which arise every day during SMILE operations, this tissue is much more accessible than any other kind of corneal tissue. According to the experience with lenticule implantation in animal models, or even human patients, lenticule implantation is considered safe, reversible method, which is not associated with immune rejection or other severe complications. However, the crucial step before the process of lenticule implantation, is proper preservation of this tissue. Donor corneal tissue containing endothelium is usually preserved in hypothermia and then usable maximally for two weeks. Newer methods such as organ culture storage and use of a sterile cornea prolong the time of usability of the tissue. The possibilities for corneal lenticule storage are theoretically wider thanks to the fact, that we do not need to preserve fragile cellular structures. Besides the storage in hypothermia, other preserving methods such as cryopreservation and storage after decellularization have been tested. This review aimed to examine the current literature that describes possible methods of corneal lenticule preservation. A comprehensive search was created based on articles published in English on PubMed.gov, Cochranelibrary.com and Scopus.com using following keywords: corneal lenticule preservation, corneal lenticule storage, cold storage corneal lenticule, corneal lenticule cryopreservation till 2020.

Indexed as

Corneal StromaHypothermiaAnimalsCorneaCryopreservationEndothelium, CornealHumansCold storage corneal lenticuleCorneal lenticule cryopreservationCorneal lenticule implantationCorneal lenticule preservationCorneal lenticule storageKeratophakia

Identifiers

PMID35124756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.