Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35124738›Full record

SynthesisSurgery today2023

Cystic duct cyst in adults: a systematic review of the sixth entity.

Ahmad Al Samaraee, Vish Bhattacharya

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgery today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad Al SamaraeeDepartment of General Surgery, Ashford & St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford St, Chertsey, KT16 0PZ, UK. ahmadas@doctors.org.uk.
Vish BhattacharyaGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there have been an increasing number of reports describing a sixth type of choledochal cyst (cystic duct cyst) in adults that was not included in Todani's classification. This sixth entity has not yet been systematically reviewed in the literature. We therefore explored this condition in adults from the perspective of the clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment through a systematic review of the evidence. The final analysis included 33 reported cases, with 55% of them reported in Asia. The mean age was 39.3 years old, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.5:1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was accurate in establishing the diagnosis in 69% of cases. Where reported, standard laparoscopic/open cholecystectomy was performed in about 74% of patients, while around 25% of them needed extensive surgery. Associated malignancy was reported in 6.1% of cases, while 28% of patients had co-existent gallstone-related disease. No significant post-operative morbidity or mortality was reported. In this era of emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy, surgeons should be aware of this rare condition, with the particular understanding that it is associated with gallstone-related disease in a significant number of reported cases.

Indexed as

Choledochal CystGallstonesAdultCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomyCystic DuctFemaleHumansMaleCystic duct cystCystic duct dilatationType VI choledochal cyst

Identifiers

PMID35124738
OpenAlexW4210310138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.