Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35124720›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Refining risk stratification in HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: how to select patients for treatment escalation?

Stefania Morganti, Antonio Marra, Edoardo Crimini, Paolo D'Amico, Paola Zagami, Giuseppe Curigliano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefania Morganti *Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, Milan, Italy.
Antonio Marra *Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, Milan, Italy.
Edoardo CriminiDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, Milan, Italy.
Paolo D'AmicoDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, Milan, Italy.
Paola ZagamiDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, Milan, Italy. giuseppe.curigliano@ieo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1781-2518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite advances in adjuvant therapeutic strategies, many patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC) experience disease recurrence, even many years after primary surgery. The aim of this review is: (i) to point out the current clinical, pathological, and genomic features that contribute to define the risk of recurrence in HR-positive EBC, (ii) to explore the potential role of liquid biopsy-based assays for refining risk assessment, and (iii) to discuss future perspectives and innovative strategies to optimize risk stratification and select patients for treatment escalation.

methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus to review the current evidence about risk stratification in patients with HR-positive EBC, and to identify studies deemed to have the highest scientific value.

resultsRisk stratification of HR-positive/HER2-negative relies on traditional clinicopathological features (age, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal status, tumor grading, HR expression level, and proliferation markers), along with newly developed genomic scores, which accurately predict risk of recurrence and survival. Multiparametric scores including both clinicopathological and genomic variables have the highest prognostication power, even if comparative studies have not defined which one should be preferred. In parallel, liquid biopsy-based showed to be a valuable tool to identify high risk patients.

conclusionThe most appropriate definition of "high" and "low" risk HR-positive EBC is still unclear. Accordingly, treatment escalation/de-escalation depending on recurrence risk remains challenging. Implementation of new tools for risk stratification, such as liquid biopsy-based assays, as well as development of novel treatment strategies are strongly warranted.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEarly breast cancerHR-positiveLiquid biopsyMinimal residual diseaseRisk stratificationTreatment escalation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.