ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2022
Refining risk stratification in HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: how to select patients for treatment escalation?
Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chemotherapy and gene expression profiling in older early luminal breast cancer patients: An International Society of Geriatric Oncology systematic review.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2022Pooled it
- Characterizing heterogeneous cis-regulatory elements in gene regulatory programs associated with breast cancer.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predicts survival in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: a pre-to-post neoadjuvant chemotherapy study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Integrative Machine Learning Model for Overall Survival Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Clinical and Transcriptomic Data.Biology · 2025Article
- Differences in survival outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer across heterogeneous HR expression patterns: a real-world study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Multimodal histopathologic models stratify hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Identification of lineage-specific epigenetic regulators FOXA1 and GRHL2 through chromatin accessibility profiling in breast cancer cell lines.Cancer gene therapy · 2024Article
- Chromatin profile-based identification of a novel ER-positive breast cancer subgroup with reduced ER-responsive element accessibility.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite advances in adjuvant therapeutic strategies, many patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC) experience disease recurrence, even many years after primary surgery. The aim of this review is: (i) to point out the current clinical, pathological, and genomic features that contribute to define the risk of recurrence in HR-positive EBC, (ii) to explore the potential role of liquid biopsy-based assays for refining risk assessment, and (iii) to discuss future perspectives and innovative strategies to optimize risk stratification and select patients for treatment escalation.
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus to review the current evidence about risk stratification in patients with HR-positive EBC, and to identify studies deemed to have the highest scientific value.
resultsRisk stratification of HR-positive/HER2-negative relies on traditional clinicopathological features (age, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal status, tumor grading, HR expression level, and proliferation markers), along with newly developed genomic scores, which accurately predict risk of recurrence and survival. Multiparametric scores including both clinicopathological and genomic variables have the highest prognostication power, even if comparative studies have not defined which one should be preferred. In parallel, liquid biopsy-based showed to be a valuable tool to identify high risk patients.
conclusionThe most appropriate definition of "high" and "low" risk HR-positive EBC is still unclear. Accordingly, treatment escalation/de-escalation depending on recurrence risk remains challenging. Implementation of new tools for risk stratification, such as liquid biopsy-based assays, as well as development of novel treatment strategies are strongly warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35124720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.