ArticleDermatology (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Validation of a Market-Approved Artificial Intelligence Mobile Health App for Skin Cancer Screening: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Primary and Secondary Prevention Measures for Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Pooled it
- The multiple uses of artificial intelligence in exercise programs: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for skin cancer detection and classification for clinical environment: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance, Clinical Applications, and Implementation Challenges (2003-2025).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Digital Evolution of the Medical Black Bag: Environmental Scan With Trend Analysis and Horizon Scanning.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Towards a clinically integrated artificial intelligence tool for triage of skin cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- How good are artificial intelligence tools at identifying benign skin lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the specificity of artificial intelligence tools in diagnosing suspicious skin lesions.Skin health and disease · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence for enhanced skin cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and New Technologies in Melanoma Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- The feasibility of M-health for people with chronic low back pain in Shanghai, China: A qualitative study.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2025Article
- Mobile health apps for skin cancer triage in the general population: a qualitative study on healthcare providers' perspectives.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Non-Invasive Detection of Melanoma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Smartphone Application for Detection of Simulated Skin Changes: An In Vivo Pilot Study.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
- Review
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Skin Disease Diagnosis in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- "Notification! You May Have Cancer." Could Smartphones and Wearables Help Detect Cancer Early?JMIR cancer · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in skin cancer smartphone applications.Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Review
- A Report and Proposals for Future Activity from the Inaugural Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology Symposium Held at the International Societies for Investigative Dermatology 2023 Meeting.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024Article
- Existing Barriers Faced by and Future Design Recommendations for Direct-to-Consumer Health Care Artificial Intelligence Apps: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile health (mHealth) consumer applications (apps) have been integrated with deep learning for skin cancer risk assessments. However, prospective validation of these apps is lacking.
objectivesTo identify the diagnostic accuracy of an app integrated with a convolutional neural network for the detection of premalignant and malignant skin lesions.
methodsWe performed a prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of a CE-marked mHealth app from January 1 until August 31, 2020, among adult patients with at least one suspicious skin lesion. Skin lesions were assessed by the app on an iOS or Android device after clinical diagnosis and before obtaining histopathology. The app outcome was compared to the histopathological diagnosis, or if not available, the clinical diagnosis by a dermatologist. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the app to detect premalignant and malignant skin lesions. Subgroup analyses were conducted for different smartphone types, the lesion's origin, indication for dermatological consultation, and lesion location.
resultsIn total, 785 lesions, including 418 suspicious and 367 benign control lesions, among 372 patients (50.8% women) with a median age of 71 years were included. The app performed at an overall 86.9% (95% CI 82.3-90.7) sensitivity and 70.4% (95% CI 66.2-74.3) specificity. The sensitivity was significantly higher on the iOS device compared to the Android device (91.0 vs. 83.0%; p = 0.02). Specificity calculated on benign control lesions was significantly higher than suspicious skin lesions (80.1 vs. 45.5%; p < 0.001). Sensitivity was higher in skin fold areas compared to smooth skin areas (92.9 vs. 84.2%; p = 0.01), while the specificity was higher for lesions in smooth skin areas (72.0 vs. 56.6%; p = 0.02).
conclusionThe diagnostic accuracy of the mHealth app is far from perfect, but is potentially promising to empower patients to self-assess skin lesions before consulting a health care professional. An additional prospective validation study, particularly for suspicious pigmented skin lesions, is warranted. Furthermore, studies investigating mHealth implementation in the lay population are needed to demonstrate the impact on health care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.