ReviewJournal of infection and public health2022
"SPEECH": A literature based framework for the study of past epidemics.
Review in Journal of infection and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating socio-ecosystemic factors in One Health approaches: a scoping review in zoonotic disease research.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- REVISITING THE EBOLA EPIDEMIC IN WEST AFRICA: THE ROLE OF EMOTIONAL DETERMINANTS IN PUBLIC RESPONSES.African journal of infectious diseases · 2023Article
- The 1889-90 flu pandemic in Greece: a social, cultural and economic history with lessons for the 21Le infezioni in medicina · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis paper details the development of a public health research framework for the holistic examination of past epidemics. The Covid-19 pandemic has further highlighted the influence of a breadth of determinants of infectious disease morbidity and mortality. These are multidisciplinary and act in conjunction with each other. Hence, a broader interdisciplinary framework is required to conduct a comprehensive in-depth study of past epidemics and pandemics which focuses, not only on the epidemiology, but also on the broader political, social, economic and cultural factors which impact upon the public's risk perception and response to infectious disease outbreaks.
methodsA literature review was performed based on a systematic approach framework. Publications of interest were identified through a search of PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, the latter especially for additional grey literature, and reference lists were hand searched for further articles to include. Key determinants were extracted and classified based initially on the European Core Health Community Indicators (ECHIs), and further refined through narrative summary.
resultsA total of 45 studies were identified, 13 of which fulfilled the inclusion criteria of comprehensive secondary research. A total of 26 determinants were extracted from the 13 publications, including microbiological, socioeconomic, political, meteorological and genetic determinants. Of the 26 identified factors, those prioritised were the 16 most relevant to the aim of applying a public health, rather than a narrow medical, lens to studying epidemics through considering a broader ecosystem of influences. The 16 determinants were summarised and categorised into the SPEECH (Society and Politics, Economy, Epidemiology, Culture, Healthcare and Public Health) framework.
conclusionThe interdisciplinary SPEECH framework set out in this paper provides the structure for the systematic and holistic in-depth investigation of past epidemics, incorporating the multitude of contextual factors which impact upon infectious disease outbreaks and the public's response to them at a national level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.