Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123922›Full record

ArticleWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2022

Large gaps in the quality of healthcare experienced by Swedish mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO standards.

Mehreen Zaigham, Karolina Linden, Verena Sengpiel, Ilaria Mariani, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Benedetta Covi, Marzia Lazzerini, Helen Elden, IMAgiNE EURO Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Quality of maternal and newborn care in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO quality standards.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  14. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth in Luxembourg during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  15. Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and newborn health care in private versus public facilities: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 16 countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  16. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth for migrant versus nonmigrant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 11 countries of the WHO European region.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  17. Women's assessment of the quality of hospital-based perinatal care by mode of birth in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mehreen ZaighamObstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. Electronic address: mehreen.zaigham@med.lu.se.
Karolina LindenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Verena SengpielRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ilaria MarianiInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.
Emanuelle Pessa ValenteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.
Benedetta CoviInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.
Marzia LazzeriniInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.
Helen EldenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
IMAgiNE EURO Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and problemExisting healthcare systems have been put under immense pressure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disruptions in essential maternal and newborn services have come from even high-income countries within the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region.

aimTo describe the quality of care during pregnancy and childbirth, as reported by the women themselves, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, using the WHO 'Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities'.

methodsUsing an anonymous, online questionnaire, women ≥18 years were invited to participate if they had given birth in Sweden from March 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. The quality of maternal and newborn care was measured using 40 questions across four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human/physical resources, and organisational changes due to COVID-19.

findingsOf the 5003 women included, n = 4528 experienced labour. Of these, 46.7% perceived a poorer quality of maternal and newborn care due to the COVID-19. Fundal pressure was applied in 22.2% of instrumental vaginal births, 36.8% received inadequate breastfeeding support and 6.9% reported some form of abuse. Findings were worse in women undergoing prelabour Caesarean section (CS) (n = 475). Multivariate analysis showed significant associations of the quality of maternal and newborn care to year of birth (P < 0.001), parity (P < 0.001), no pharmacological pain relief (P < 0.001), prelabour CS (P < 0.001), emergency CS (P < 0.001) and overall satisfaction (P < 0.001).

conclusionConsiderable gaps over many key quality measures and deviations from women-centred care were noted. Findings were worse in women with prelabour CS. Actions to promote high-quality, evidence-based and respectful care during childbirth for all mothers are urgently needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsPregnancySwedenWorld Health OrganizationChildbirthCOVID-19Cross-sectional studyMaternalNewbornQuality of careRespectful maternity careSwedenWHO

Identifiers

PMID35123922
PMCPMC8784577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.