Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123665›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2022

COVID-19 in Europe: new challenges for addressing vaccine hesitancy.

Emilie Karafillakis, Pierre Van Damme, Greet Hendrickx, Heidi J Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A risk science perspective on vaccines.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2024
    Article
  10. Trust and Support for Cancer Research Biobanks: Insights from Cancer Patients in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilie KarafillakisVaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Pierre Van DammeVaccine Confidence Project (European Regional Office), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Greet HendrickxVaccine Confidence Project (European Regional Office), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Heidi J LarsonVaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Vaccine Confidence Project (European Regional Office), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: heidi.larson@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Vaccination HesitancyCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEuropeHumansMass VaccinationPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35123665
PMCPMC8813064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.