ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022
A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Public involvement in Australian clinical trials: A systematic review.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Questions for more insightful and useful analyses of barriers and facilitators to public involvement and engagement in health research: a critical narrative review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Partnering with patients and the public in the clinical trials ecosystem: a decade of lessons learned and shared.BMJ open · 2026Review
- Towards Meaningful Consumer and Community Involvement in Health Research: A Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- A qualitative study of cancer clinical trial network consumers' acceptability of the modular approach to patient-reported outcome measurement: how much of it is "common sense"?Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Who CaREs - We do: Development of a community and researcher engagement program in translational medicine.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Experiences of current practice, priorities and strategies for enabling meaningful consumer and community involvement collaborations in health and medical research in Queensland, Australia.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- The Extent and Nature of Lived Experience Engagement in the Development of Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2014-2025: A Scoping Review.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- 'Making little ethical decisions all the time': examining an ethical framework for consumer and community involvement in research, a co-produced ethnographic study.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Doing community involvement care-fully: using an ethic of care to guide involvement in research on women's health after pregnancy complications and loss.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Prioritisation of clinical trial learning needs of musculoskeletal researchers: an inter-disciplinary modified Delphi study by the Australia & New Zealand musculoskeletal clinical trials network.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Exploring Consumers' Motivations and Experiences of Engaging as Partners in Cancer Research.The patient · 2024Article
- [Participation of Patients in the Development of Clinical Guidelines: A Selective Country Comparison in a Narrative Review].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023Review
- Researcher Perceptions of Involving Consumers in Health Research in Australia: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- 'Learning and growing together': exploring consumer partnerships in a PhD, an ethnographic study.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Adopting recommendations for implementing patient involvement in cancer research: a funder's approach.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Selection of endpoints in breast cancer clinical trials: a qualitative study of key trial stakeholders.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about the extent, perceptions or experiences of consumers involved in clinical trials across Australia. The purpose of this National study was to better understand the activity and perceptions of clinical trial networks (CTNs), research co-ordinating centres and their consumers, around consumer involvement in clinical trials.
methodsCTNs and research co-ordinating centres who were members of the Australian Clinical Trials Alliance (ACTA), and consumers involved in the activities of these organisations, were invited to participate in online surveys. Surveys were completed between April and September 2018.
results80 respondents completed the surveys in full: 25 of 34 CTNs, 5 from 15 research co-ordinating centres, and included research investigators of 13 active trials, 10 completed trials. There were 27 consumer respondents. Consumers were involved in clinical trial activities across 19/25 (76%) of CTNs and 3/5 (60%) of research co-ordinating centres. Consumers were involved at all stages of the trial cycle. Despite this, only 8/30 (27%) of research organisations provided specific training to their employees or members on consumer involvement in research, and most did not have a specific policy or process relating to conducting consumer involvement in clinical trials. At the organisation level, barriers to consumer involvement in clinical trials included being unsure how to involve consumers effectively and systematically, difficulty in accessing consumers or lack of infrastructure and resources. At the consumer level, barriers included limited understanding of their roles, a lack of resources and training. Enablers included education, training and funding for both the research sector and for consumers. Almost all consumer respondents (25/27; 92%) would recommend the consumer role to other potential consumers, stating it was a valuable experience that led to knowledge exchange and learning about the research process.
conclusionsOver the last few years, consumer involvement in clinical trials has increased in Australia, but the scope of involvement varies across different research organisations, and therapeutic areas. Consumer involvement in clinical trials is valued by most that do it, however, there are opportunities to further foster and strengthen ongoing partnerships, for example by providing practical advice for researchers on how to best engage and involve consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.