Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123578›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2022

Metabolic imaging with FDG-PET and time to progression in patients discontinuing immune-checkpoint inhibition for metastatic melanoma.

Justin Ferdinandus, Anne Zaremba, Lisa Zimmer, Lale Umutlu, Robert Seifert, Francesco Barbato, Selma Ugurel, Eleftheria Chorti, Viktor Grünwald, Ken Herrmann and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of [European radiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Survival after cessation of immunotherapies in melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Role and Potential ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justin Ferdinandus *Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. justin.ferdinandus@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-7997
Anne Zaremba *Department of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. anne.zaremba@uk-essen.de.
Lisa ZimmerDepartment of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Lale UmutluDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Robert SeifertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Francesco BarbatoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Selma UgurelDepartment of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Eleftheria ChortiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Viktor GrünwaldDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Wolfgang Peter Fendler *Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Elisabeth Livingstone *Department of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr, 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEEssen University Hospital · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal duration of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy is not well established. Active residual disease is considered prohibitive for treatment discontinuation and its detection by diagnostic CT imaging is limited. Here, we set out to determine the potential added value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to identify patients at higher risk of relapse following discontinuation of ICB in advanced melanoma.

methodsMetastatic melanoma patients who discontinued ICB were identified retrospectively. Eligible patients received FDG-PET and diagnostic CT within four months of ICB discontinuation. We defined morphologic response using RECIST v1.1. Complete metabolic response (CMR) was defined as uptake in tumor lesions below background, whereas any site of residual, FDG-avid disease was rated as non-CMR. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) after therapy discontinuation stratified by morphologic and metabolic imaging response using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test.

resultsThiry-eight patients were eligible for this analysis. Median follow-up was 37.3 months since ICB discontinuation. Median TTP in the overall cohort was not reached. A greater proportion of patients were rated as CMR in PET (n = 34, 89.5%) as compared to complete response (CR) in CT (n = 13, 34.2%). Median TTP was reached in patients with non-CMR (12.7 months, 95%CI 4.4-not reached) but not for patients with CMR (log-rank: p < 0.001). All patients with complete response by CT had CMR by PET. In a subset of patients excluding those with complete response by CT, TTP remained significantly different between CMR and non-CMR (log-rank: p < 0.001).

conclusionAdditional FDG-PET at time of discontinuation of ICB therapy helps identify melanoma patients with a low risk of recurrence and favourable prognosis compared to CT imaging alone. Results may have clinical relevance especially for patients with residual tumor burden.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsRadiopharmaceuticalsCheckpoint inhibitionDiscontinuationFDGImmunotherapyMelanomaPET

Identifiers

PMID35123578
PMCPMC8817553
OpenAlexW4210480705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.