Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123528›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2022

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers that reflect clinical symptoms in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.

Heikki Lukkarinen, Anna Jeppsson, Carsten Wikkelsö, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Radu Constantinescu, Anne M Remes, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Mikko Hiltunen, Tuomas Rauramaa and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Utility of cortical tissue analysis in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Association between p-tau181 in cerebrospinal fluid and shunt response in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Heikki LukkarinenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. heikki.lukkarinen@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-6982
Anna JeppssonHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carsten WikkelsöHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Radu ConstantinescuDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anne M RemesUnit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Sanna-Kaisa HerukkaDepartment of Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mikko HiltunenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Tuomas RauramaaDepartment of Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Katarina NäggaDepartment of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ville LeinonenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mats TullbergHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SEOulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

The effects of iron on oxidative stress and Alzheimer's biomarkers in amyloid-positive and negative elderly normalR01AG068398 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHIANG, GLORIA CHIA-YI · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
Academy of Finland 339767Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala 5252614NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and the clinical features of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) has been inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate CSF biomarkers reflecting Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related amyloid β (Aβ) aggregation, tau pathology, neuroinflammation and axonal degeneration in relation to the clinical features of pre- and post-shunt surgery in iNPH patients.

methodsMini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and gait velocity were evaluated pre- and postoperatively in cohorts of 65 Finnish (FIN) and 82 Swedish (SWE) iNPH patients. Lumbar CSF samples were obtained prior to shunt surgery and analysed for soluble amyloid precursor protein alpha (sAPPα) and beta (sAPPβ); amyloid-β isoforms of 42, 40 and 38 (Aβ

resultsPreoperative patient characteristics showed no significant differences between patients in the FIN and SWE cohorts. Patients in both cohorts had significantly improved gait velocity after shunt surgery (p < 0.0001). Low CSF T-tau and absence of apolipoprotein E ε4 predicted over 20% gait improvement postoperatively (p = 0.043 and p = 0.008). Preoperative CSF T-tau, P-tau

conclusionsCSF biomarkers of neurodegeneration appeared to correlate with pre- and postoperative cognition, providing a window into neuropathological processes. In addition, preoperative CSF neurodegeneration biomarkers may have potential in the prediction of gait and cognitive outcomes after shunt surgery.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionGait Disorders, NeurologicHydrocephalus, Normal PressureOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleVentriculoperitoneal ShuntBiomarkersBiomarkersIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusiNPH

Identifiers

PMID35123528
PMCPMC8817565
OpenAlexW4210379843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.