Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123504›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Psychometric evaluation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) in Norwegian patients admitted to elective coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ingvild Nordnes Myrbakk, Oddgeir Friborg, Anne Høye, Terje Steigen, Svein Bergvik

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingvild Nordnes MyrbakkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. ingvild.n.myrbakk@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-5503
Oddgeir FriborgDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Anne HøyeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Terje SteigenClinical Cardiovascular Research Group, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Svein BergvikDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

UiTs publiseringsfond IN-1096130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) measures health-related quality of life and outcome of invasive revascularization procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The CROQ has not been properly validated in Norwegian patient populations. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Norwegian CROQ in patients admitted to elective coronary angiographic assessment and receiving PCI. Moreover, to examine its discriminative ability to detect disease severity and effects of invasive coronary treatment.

methodsThe patients (N = 280, M

resultsSignificant stenosis qualifying for a PCI was detected in 121 (35.1%) patients. The model fit of the original CROQ factor model was inadequate in the PCI group. All but one of the CROQ items demonstrated ceiling effects. The CROQ failed to discriminate between patients' disease severity prior to the coronary angiography, or improvement in those receiving versus not receiving PCI.

conclusionThe present study of the Norwegian version of the CROQ identified serious problems with the factor structure, ceiling effects, and lack of sensitivity for disease severity and effects of invasive treatment. Currently, one cannot recommend the use of CROQ in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedChildCoronary AngiographyHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeCoronary heart diseaseCoronary revascularisation outcome questionnaireHealth-related quality of lifePatient reported outcome measuresPercutaneous coronary interventionPsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID35123504
PMCPMC8818193
OpenAlexW4210633413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.