Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123450›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Towards optimal treatment selection for borderline personality disorder patients (BOOTS): a study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing schema therapy and dialectical behavior therapy.

Carlijn J M Wibbelink, Arnoud Arntz, Raoul P P P Grasman, Roland Sinnaeve, Michiel Boog, Odile M C Bremer, Eliane C P Dek, Sevinç Göral Alkan, Chrissy James, Annemieke M Koppeschaar and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlijn J M WibbelinkDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam, 1018 WS, the Netherlands. C.J.M.Wibbelink@uva.nl.
Arnoud ArntzDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam, 1018 WS, the Netherlands.
Raoul P P P GrasmanDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam, 1018 WS, the Netherlands.
Roland SinnaeveDepartment of Neurosciences, Mind Body Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Michiel BoogDepartment of Addiction and Personality, Antes Mental Health Care, Max Euwelaan 1, Rotterdam, 3062 MA, the Netherlands.
Odile M C BremerArkin Mental Health, NPI Institute for Personality Disorders, Domselaerstraat 128, Amsterdam, 1093 MB, the Netherlands.
Eliane C P DekPsyQ Personality Disorders Rotterdam-Kralingen, Max Euwelaan 70, Rotterdam, 3062 MA, the Netherlands.
Sevinç Göral Alkani-psy Amsterdam, Overschiestraat 61, Amsterdam, 1062 XD, the Netherlands.
Chrissy JamesDepartment of Personality Disorders, Outpatient Clinic De Nieuwe Valerius, GGZ inGeest, Amstelveenseweg 589, Amsterdam, 1082 JC, the Netherlands.
Annemieke M KoppeschaarPsyQ Amsterdam, Overschiestraat 57, Amsterdam, 1062 XD, the Netherlands.
Linda KramerGGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, Stationsplein 138, 1703 WC, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands.
Maria PloegmakersPro Persona, Siependaallaan 3, Tiel, 4003 LE, the Netherlands.
Arita SchalingPro Persona, Willy Brandtlaan 20, Ede, 6716 RR, the Netherlands.
Faye I SmitsGGZ Rivierduinen, Sandifortdreef 19, Leiden, 2333 ZZ, the Netherlands.
Jan H KamphuisDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, Amsterdam, 1018 WS, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLPro Persona · NLAntes · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLGGZ inGeest · NLGGZ Noord-Holland-Noord · NLGGZ Rivierduinen · NLKU Leuven · BEReinier van Arkel · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecialized evidence-based treatments have been developed and evaluated for borderline personality disorder (BPD), including Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and Schema Therapy (ST). Individual differences in treatment response to both ST and DBT have been observed across studies, but the factors driving these differences are largely unknown. Understanding which treatment works best for whom and why remain central issues in psychotherapy research. The aim of the present study is to improve treatment response of DBT and ST for BPD patients by a) identifying patient characteristics that predict (differential) treatment response (i.e., treatment selection) and b) understanding how both treatments lead to change (i.e., mechanisms of change). Moreover, the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of DBT and ST will be evaluated.

methodsThe BOOTS trial is a multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in a routine clinical setting in several outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. We aim to recruit 200 participants, to be randomized to DBT or ST. Patients receive a combined program of individual and group sessions for a maximum duration of 25 months. Data are collected at baseline until three-year follow-up. Candidate predictors of (differential) treatment response have been selected based on the literature, a patient representative of the Borderline Foundation of the Netherlands, and semi-structured interviews among 18 expert clinicians. In addition, BPD-treatment-specific (ST: beliefs and schema modes; DBT: emotion regulation and skills use), BPD-treatment-generic (therapeutic environment characterized by genuineness, safety, and equality), and non-specific (attachment and therapeutic alliance) mechanisms of change are assessed. The primary outcome measure is change in BPD manifestations. Secondary outcome measures include functioning, additional self-reported symptoms, and well-being. DISCUSSION: The current study contributes to the optimization of treatments for BPD patients by extending our knowledge on "Which treatment - DBT or ST - works the best for which BPD patient, and why?", which is likely to yield important benefits for both BPD patients (e.g., prevention of overtreatment and potential harm of treatments) and society (e.g., increased economic productivity of patients and efficient use of treatments).

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register, NL7699 , registered 25/04/2019 - retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderDialectical Behavior TherapyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchema TherapyTreatment OutcomeBorderline personality disorderDialectical behavior therapyEffectivenessMechanisms of changeMediatorsPersonalized medicineRandomized clinical trialSchema therapyTreatment selection

Identifiers

PMID35123450
PMCPMC8817780
OpenAlexW4210660828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.