ArticleJournal of ultrasound2022
The impact of the ultrasound classification on the rate of thyroid surgery indications: a 577 cases series.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNodules of the thyroid gland are common but rarely malignant. Their management can range from simple monitoring to surgery. The use of ultrasound and fine needle aspiration can reduce the rate of unnecessary surgeries. However, there is a risk of false positives and false negatives of malignancy that only pathology can avoid. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of ultrasound classification on the rate of surgical indications. MATERIAL AND
methodsBetween 2013 and 2017, the ultrasound classification was gradually adopted in our daily practice to become now routine. During this period, we conducted a retrospective study of all the patients who presented to our department for one or more thyroid nodules.
resultsA total of 577 patients were included in the study. We compared two groups, a first where the ultrasound classification was used and a second where this classification was not used. In the end, we found that this classification significantly reduced the surgical indication by 19% while increasing the malignancy detection rate in operated patients by 21%.
conclusionsThe use of ultrasound classification reduces the indications for surgery while increasing the rate of malignancy in operated patients. The generalization of the use of the ultrasound classification score is strongly recommended in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.