ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022
Barbed pharyngoplasty for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: the surgical learning curve.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBarbed snore surgery (BSS) was recently introduced for the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with optimistic clinical outcomes associated with a low complication rate. The purpose of the present study was to describe the surgical learning curve of the BSS to determine the effect of surgeon experience on surgical procedure time and complication rates.
methodsPatients who underwent tonsillectomy with barbed lateral pharyngoplasty were divided in two different groups based on surgeon experience. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intra- and post-operative complications, and hospitalization time were compared.
resultsA total of 144 consecutive patients (F: 27; mean age: 47.5 years, SD 9.7) were included. All procedures were successfully completed in 37.0 min (IQR 29.0-47.0). Senior surgeons completed the procedure in 33.0 min (IQR 27.0-41.0), while junior surgeons needed 52.0 min (IQR 36.5-64.5) (p < .05). No intra-operative complications were observed, and intra-operative blood loss was minimal in both groups. No difference was measured in terms of hospitalization time. Only one post-operative bleeding resolved with conservative treatment was detected in both groups. Junior surgeons showed a positive trend in the reduction of operative time (r = - 2.32, 95% CI: - 2.74 to - 1.90; p < .05).
conclusionsThe findings suggest that BSS may be safely performed by inexperienced surgeons with no increased risk of intra- and post-operative complications. The surgical LC is short and the junior surgeon can reach the ability of senior surgeons after a few number of procedures with a progressive reduction of the operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.