Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122569›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology letters2022

Influence of 16S rRNA reference databases in amplicon-based environmental microbiome research.

Meganathan P Ramakodi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Host genotype-driven shifts in theFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Existence of rare actinobacterial forms in the Indian sector of Southern Ocean: 16 S rRNA based metabarcoding study.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Meganathan P RamakodiCSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Hyderabad Zonal Centre, IICT Campus, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India. meganathan.pr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-6306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe reference databases play a pivotal role in amplicon microbiome research, however these databases differ in the sequence content and taxonomic information available. Studies on mock community and human health microbiome have revealed the problems associated with the choice of reference database on the outcome. Nonetheless, the influence of reference databases in environmental microbiome studies is not explicitly illustrated.

methodsThis study analyzed the amplicon (V1V3, V3V4, V4V5 and V6V8) data of 128 soil samples and evaluated the impact of 16S rRNA databases, Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB), Ribosomal Database Project (RDP), SILVA and Consensus Taxonomy (ConTax), on microbiome inference.

resultsThe analyses showed that the distribution of observed amplicon sequence variants was significantly different (P-value < 2.647e-12) across four datasets, generated using different databases for each amplicon region. In addition, the beta diversity was also found to be altered by different databases. Further investigation revealed that the microbiome composition inferred by various databases differ significantly (P-value = 0.001), irrespective of amplicon regions. This study, found that the core-microbiome structure in environmental studies is influenced by the type of reference database used.

conclusionIn summary, this present study illustrates that the choice of reference database could influence the outcome of environmental microbiome research.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaHumansPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAAmplicon microbiomeCore microbiomeEnvironmental microorganismsReference databaseTaxonomy inference

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.