Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122529›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2022

A novel semiautomated method for background activity and biological tumour volume definition to improve standardisation of

Caterina Brighi, Simon Puttick, Shenpeng Li, Paul Keall, Katherine Neville, David Waddington, Pierrick Bourgeat, Ashley Gillman, Michael Fay

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison between [International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caterina BrighiACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. caterina.brighi@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9407-5772
Simon PuttickAustralian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Shenpeng LiAustralian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Paul KeallACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Katherine NevilleGenesisCare, Newcastle, Australia.
David WaddingtonACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Pierrick BourgeatAustralian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Ashley GillmanAustralian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael FayGenesisCare, Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

cancer institute nsw 2019/ECF1015commonwealth scientific and industrial research organisation Probing Biosystems Future Science Platformnational health and medical research council APP1132471national health and medical research council APP1194004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulticentre clinical trials evaluating the role of

resultsCompared to the gCS method, the MI method showed significantly lower intra- and inter-reader variability both in background activity and in BTV definition.

conclusionsThe proposed semiautomated MI method minimises intra- and inter-reader variability, providing a valuable approach for standardisation of

Indexed as

18F-FET PETBackground activityGliomaMethod standardisationPET imaging

Identifiers

PMID35122529
PMCPMC8818070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.