Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122520›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2022

Revisiting horizontal connectivity rules in V1: from like-to-like towards like-to-all.

Frédéric Chavane, Laurent Udo Perrinet, James Rankin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Principles of cortical interactions in modular recurrent networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clustered Intrinsic Connections: Not a Single System.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frédéric ChavaneInstitut de Neurosciences de La Timone (INT), CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, UMR 7289, Campus Santé Timone, 27 boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France. frederic.chavane@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7916-2640
Laurent Udo PerrinetInstitut de Neurosciences de La Timone (INT), CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, UMR 7289, Campus Santé Timone, 27 boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France.
James RankinDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QJ, UK.

Funding

ANR ANR-17-CE37-0006-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Horizontal connections in the primary visual cortex of carnivores, ungulates and primates organize on a near-regular lattice. Given the similar length scale for the regularity found in cortical orientation maps, the currently accepted theoretical standpoint is that these maps are underpinned by a like-to-like connectivity rule: horizontal axons connect preferentially to neurons with similar preferred orientation. However, there is reason to doubt the rule's explanatory power, since a growing number of quantitative studies show that the like-to-like connectivity preference and bias mostly observed at short-range scale, are highly variable on a neuron-to-neuron level and depend on the origin of the presynaptic neuron. Despite the wide availability of published data, the accepted model of visual processing has never been revised. Here, we review three lines of independent evidence supporting a much-needed revision of the like-to-like connectivity rule, ranging from anatomy to population functional measures, computational models and to theoretical approaches. We advocate an alternative, distance-dependent connectivity rule that is consistent with new structural and functional evidence: from like-to-like bias at short horizontal distance to like-to-all at long horizontal distance. This generic rule accounts for the observed high heterogeneity in interactions between the orientation and retinotopic domains, that we argue is necessary to process non-trivial stimuli in a task-dependent manner.

Indexed as

Visual CortexVisual PathwaysAnimalsAxonsNeuronsVisual PerceptionComputational and theoretical neuroscienceConnectivity rulesFunctional optical imagingHorizontal intra-cortical axonsOrientation and retinotopic mapsPrimary visual cortexStructural advanced anatomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.