Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122485›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology international2022

The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on plantar fasciitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Özgür Can Caner, Seçilay Güneş, Derya Gökmen, Şebnem Ataman, Şehim Kutlay

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A Narrative Review of Shockwave Therapy in Plantar Fasciitis.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Özgür Can CanerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Akşehir Parkhayat Hastanesi, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-3647
Seçilay GüneşFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. secilaygunes@ankara.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-7094
Derya GökmenDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-3035
Şebnem AtamanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3570-3825
Şehim KutlayFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6869-6070
Ankara University · TRKonya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

Turkish League 14.01.2020/01-565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on chronic plantar fasciitis (PF) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remain unclear. To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of ESWT in patients with PF in axSpA. In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 22 axSpA patients with PF who had heel pain above 5 according to visual analog scale (VAS) over 3 months were randomly divided into 2 groups: ESWT and sham-ESWT. Both groups received a total of three treatments at 1-week intervals. All patients were assessed by the VAS, heel pressure algometry, Foot Function Index (FFI), and plantar fascia ultrasonography (thickness and morphology) at baseline, 1 week after each session, 4th and 8th week after the last therapy. The mean ± SD ages of the ESWT and sham-ESWT groups were 43.8 ± 8.2 and 48.5 ± 7.6 years, respectively. Significant time effects between the time points were observed in both groups in terms of VAS, pressure algometry, and FFI. There was a statistically significant decrease in pain, an increase in perceived pressure algometry values, and an improvement in activity restriction in the ESWT group compared to the sham-ESWT group. There was not a change in the plantar fascia thickness before and after the intervention in both groups. No side effects were observed during the treatment and follow-up. ESWT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated physical therapy modality for improving chronic refractory heel pain due to PF in patients with axSPA. This trial was registered to The Australian New Zealand clinical trial with the registration number ACTRN12618001954213. The enrollment began in 15/12/2018 and data collection stopped in 29/05/2020.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyFasciitis, PlantarAdultAustraliaHumansMiddle AgedPainTreatment OutcomeAxial spondyloarthritisExtracorporeal shock wave therapyFoot functionHeel painPlantar fasciitisUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35122485
OpenAlexW4210627547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.