ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Addressing concomitant gradient phase errors in time-interleaved chemical shift-encoded MRI fat fraction and R
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of bi- and tri-component approaches for the analysis of short-TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Fat-water MRI separation using deep complex convolution network.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Addressing fatty tissue in quantitative susceptibility mapping of human knee cartilage.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Confidence maps for reliable estimation of proton density fat fraction andMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Confounder-corrected TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConcomitant gradients induce phase errors that increase quadratically with distance from isocenter. This work proposes a complex-based fitting method that addresses concomitant gradient phase errors in chemical shift encoded (CSE) MRI estimation of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R THEORY AND
methodsA CSE-MRI spoiled gradient echo signal model, with pass-specific phase terms, is introduced for non-linear least squares estimation of PDFF and R
resultsThe proposed fitting method removed PDFF and R
conclusionConcomitant gradient induced phase errors in multi-pass CSE-MRI acquisitions can result in PDFF and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.