ReviewClinical and translational science2022
Computational models in inflammatory bowel disease.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- From signals to systems: the epigenetic-microbiome-mitochondrial axis in IBD pathogenesis.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- A biomechanical model of inflammation-driven colon hypertrophy and dysmotility: Application to Gulf War Illness.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Microbiome-metabolite signaling networks in gastrointestinal disease: systems biology, network rewiring, and precision therapeutics.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Mechanomedicine in digestive surgery: a theranostic framework integrating mechanical diagnostics and therapeutic modulation across the perioperative continuum.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven gastrointestinal functional assessment: multimodal imaging, digital biomarkers, and real-time monitoring.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025Review
- Exploring the Potential of Digital Twins in Cancer Treatment: A Narrative Review of Reviews.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The impact of artificial intelligence on the endoscopic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease-related neoplasia.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Combining mechanistic modeling with machine learning as a strategy to predict inflammatory bowel disease clinical scores.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Digital biomarkers and artificial intelligence: a new frontier in personalized management of inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- Using Constrained-Disorder Principle-Based Systems to Improve the Performance of Digital Twins in Biological Systems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence and inflammatory bowel disease: Where are we going?World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Impact of artificial intelligence on prognosis, shared decision-making, and precision medicine for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a perspective and expert opinion.Annals of medicine · 2023Review
- Computational models in inflammatory bowel disease.Clinical and translational science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and relapsing disease with multiple underlying influences and notable heterogeneity among its clinical and response-to-treatment phenotypes. There is no cure for IBD, and none of the currently available therapies have demonstrated clinical efficacies beyond 40%-60%. Data collected about its omics, pathogenesis, and treatment strategies have grown exponentially with time making IBD a prime candidate for artificial intelligence (AI) mediated discovery support. AI can be leveraged to further understand or identify IBD features to improve clinical outcomes. Various treatment candidates are currently under evaluation in clinical trials, offering further approaches and opportunities for increasing the efficacies of treatments. However, currently, therapeutic plans are largely determined using clinical features due to the lack of specific biomarkers, and it has become necessary to step into precision medicine to predict therapeutic responses to guarantee optimal treatment efficacy. This is accompanied by the application of AI and the development of multiscale hybrid models combining mechanistic approaches and machine learning. These models ultimately lead to the creation of digital twins of given patients delivering on the promise of precision dosing and tailored treatment. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a prominent cytokine in cell-to-cell communication in the inflammatory responses' regulation. Dysregulated IL-6-induced signaling leads to severe immunological or proliferative pathologies, such as IBD and colon cancer. This mini-review explores multiscale models with the aim of predicting the response to therapy in IBD. Modeling IL-6 biology and generating digital twins enhance the credibility of their prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.