Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122234›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Improving neuromuscular monitoring and reducing residual neuromuscular blockade via e-learning: A multicentre interrupted time-series study (INVERT study).

Jakob Louis Demant Thomsen, Ole Mathiesen, Daniel Hägi-Pedersen, Lene T Skovgaard, Doris Østergaard, Mona R Gätke, INVERT collaborator group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02925143 (Improving Neuromuscular Monitoring and Reducing Residual Neuromuscular Blockade Via E-learning - a Multicenter Interrupted Time Series Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02925143 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Neuromuscular Monitoring and Reducing Residual Neuromuscular Blockade Via E-learning - a Multicenter Interrupted Time Series Study (INVERT Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHerlev HospitalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled6,525ConditionsNeuromuscular BlockadeArmsE-learning course in neuromuscular monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in Neuromuscular Monitoring Techniques in Anesthesiology: A 2025 Perspective.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jakob Louis Demant ThomsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2827-7904
Ole MathiesenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Daniel Hägi-PedersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene T SkovgaardDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Doris ØstergaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mona R GätkeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
INVERT collaborator group
University of Copenhagen · DKGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuromuscular monitoring should be applied routinely to avoid residual neuromuscular block. However, anaesthetists often refrain from applying it, even when the equipment is available. We aimed to increase neuromuscular monitoring in six Danish anaesthesia departments via e-learning.

methodsInterrupted time series study, with baseline data from a previous study and prospective data collection after implementation of the module, which was available for 2 weeks from 21 November 2016. We included all patients receiving general anaesthesia with muscle relaxants until 30 April 2017. Main outcome was application of acceleromyography, grouped as succinylcholine only and non-depolarising relaxants. Secondary outcomes were last recorded train-of-four ratio (non-depolarising) relaxants and score on a ten-question pre- and post-course multiple-choice test.

resultsThe post-intervention data consisted of 6525 cases (3099 (48%) succinylcholine only, 3426 (52%) non-depolarising relaxants). Analysing all departments, we found a positive pre-intervention trend in application of acceleromyography for both groups, of estimated 7.5% and 4.8% per year, respectively (p < .001). The monitoring rate increased significantly for succinylcholine in two departments post-intervention (p = .045 and .010), and for non-depolarising relaxants in one department (p = .041), but followed by a negative trend of -37.0% per year (p = .041). The rate was already close to 90% at the time of the intervention and the mean last recorded train-of-four ratio was 0.97 (SD 0.21), also without a significant change. The median score on the post-course test increased from 7 (IQR 5-8) to 9 (IQR 8-10) (p < .001, Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test).

conclusionWe found no overall effect of the e-learning module on application of neuromuscular monitoring, although the post-course test indicated an effect on anaesthetists' knowledge in this field.

trial registrationTrial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02925143. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02925143.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionDelayed Emergence from AnesthesiaNeuromuscular BlockadeHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisNeuromuscular MonitoringSuccinylcholineSuccinylcholine

Identifiers

PMID35122234
PMCPMC9541262
OpenAlexW4210280143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.