Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122217›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2022

A machine learning model based on readers' characteristics to predict their performances in reading screening mammograms.

Ziba Gandomkar, Sarah J Lewis, Tong Li, Ernest U Ekpo, Patrick C Brennan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modeling Radiologists' Assessments to Explore Pairing Strategies for Optimized Double Reading of Screening Mammograms.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ziba GandomkarImage Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Western Ave, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. ziba.gandomkar@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6480-3572
Sarah J LewisImage Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Western Ave, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Tong LiImage Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Western Ave, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Ernest U EkpoImage Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Western Ave, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Patrick C BrennanImage Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Western Ave, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

national breast cancer foundation IIRS-18-089national health and medical research council APP1162872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProposing a machine learning model to predict readers' performances, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and lesion sensitivity, using the readers' characteristics.

methodsData were collected from 905 radiologists and breast physicians who completed at least one case-set of 60 mammographic images containing 40 normal and 20 biopsy-proven cancer cases. Nine different case-sets were available. Using a questionnaire, we collected radiologists' demographic details, such as reading volume and years of experience. These characteristics along with a case set difficulty measure were fed into two ensemble of regression trees to predict the readers' AUCs and lesion sensitivities. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted values by the model and the actual AUC and lesion sensitivity. The usefulness of the model to categorize readers as low and high performers based on different criteria was also evaluated. The performances of the models were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation.

resultsThe Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted AUC and actual one was 0.60 (p < 0.001). The model's performance for differentiating the reader in the first and fourth quartile based on the AUC values was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89). The model reached an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93) for distinguishing the readers in the first quartile from the fourth one based on the lesion sensitivity.

conclusionA machine learning model can be used to categorize readers as high- or low-performing. Such model could be useful for screening programs for designing a targeted quality assurance and optimizing the double reading practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMachine LearningMammographyROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityArea under curveInter-observer variabilityMachine learningMammographyROC curve

Identifiers

PMID35122217
PMCPMC9226081
OpenAlexW4210674900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.