Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122204›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2022

Practices in sedation, analgesia, mobilization, delirium, and sleep deprivation in adult intensive care units (SAMDS-ICU): an international survey before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mariana Luz, Bruna Brandão Barreto, Roberta Esteves Vieira de Castro, Jorge Salluh, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Caio Araujo, Audrey De Jong, Gérald Chanques, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Eduardo Tobar and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ketamine sedation in the intensive care unit: a survey of Canadian intensivists.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Delirium and Coronavirus Disease 2019: Looking Back, Moving Forward.Critical care nursing clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  13. Post-ICU Care: Why, What, When and How? ISCCM Position Statement.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Mariana LuzIntensive Care Unit of the Hospital da Mulher, Rua Barão de Cotegipe, 1153, Roma, Salvador, BA, CEP: 40411-900, Brazil. marianaluzmed@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-8655
Bruna Brandão BarretoIntensive Care Unit of the Hospital da Mulher, Rua Barão de Cotegipe, 1153, Roma, Salvador, BA, CEP: 40411-900, Brazil.
Roberta Esteves Vieira de CastroDepartamento de Pediatria, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jorge SalluhDepartment of Critical Care and Postgraduate Program in Translational Medicine, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Felipe Dal-PizzolLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Caio AraujoFaculdade de Medicina da Bahia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Audrey De JongDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, PhyMedExp, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR, 9214, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Gérald ChanquesDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, PhyMedExp, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR, 9214, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Sheila Nainan MyatraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Eduardo TobarInternal Medicine Department, Critical Care Unit, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Carolina Gimenez-Esparza VichCritical Care Department, Vega Baja Orihuela Hospital, Alicante, Spain.
Federico CariniIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eugene Wesley ElyDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joanna L StollingsCritical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kelly DrumrightTennessee Valley Healthcare System VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
John KressDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pedro PovoaPolyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal.
Yahya ShehabiDepartment of Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Wilson MphandiIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Américo Boavida, Luanda, Angola.
Dimitri Gusmao-FloresIntensive Care Unit of the Hospital da Mulher, Rua Barão de Cotegipe, 1153, Roma, Salvador, BA, CEP: 40411-900, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRClínica Sagrada Esperança · AOGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USHomi Bhabha National Institute · INHospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile · CLHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARHospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto · BRHospital Vega Baja · ESMonash University · AUUniversidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Lisbon · PTVanderbilt University Medical Center · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the publication of the 2018 Clinical Guidelines about sedation, analgesia, delirium, mobilization, and sleep deprivation in critically ill patients, no evaluation and adequacy assessment of these recommendations were studied in an international context. This survey aimed to investigate these current practices and if the COVID-19 pandemic has changed them.

methodsThis study was an open multinational electronic survey directed to physicians working in adult intensive care units (ICUs), which was performed in two steps: before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsWe analyzed 1768 questionnaires and 1539 (87%) were complete. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we received 1476 questionnaires and 292 were submitted later. The following practices were observed before the pandemic: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (61.5%), the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) (48.2%), the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) (76.6%), and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) (66.6%) were the most frequently tools used to assess pain, sedation level, and delirium, respectively; midazolam and fentanyl were the most frequently used drugs for inducing sedation and analgesia (84.8% and 78.3%, respectively), whereas haloperidol (68.8%) and atypical antipsychotics (69.4%) were the most prescribed drugs for delirium treatment; some physicians regularly prescribed drugs to induce sleep (19.1%) or ordered mechanical restraints as part of their routine (6.2%) for patients on mechanical ventilation; non-pharmacological strategies were frequently applied for pain, delirium, and sleep deprivation management. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the intensive care specialty was independently associated with best practices. Moreover, the mechanical ventilation rate was higher, patients received sedation more often (94% versus 86.1%, p < 0.001) and sedation goals were discussed more frequently in daily rounds. Morphine was the main drug used for analgesia (77.2%), and some sedative drugs, such as midazolam, propofol, ketamine and quetiapine, were used more frequently.

conclusionsMost sedation, analgesia and delirium practices were comparable before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, the intensive care specialty was a variable that was independently associated with the best practices. Although many findings are in accordance with evidence-based recommendations, some practices still need improvement.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaCOVID-19DeliriumMobilizationSedationSleep deprivation

Identifiers

PMID35122204
PMCPMC8815719
OpenAlexW4210288881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.