Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122171›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2022

Psychometric performance of proxy-reported EQ-5D youth version 5-level (EQ-5D-Y-5L) in comparison with three-level (EQ-5D-Y-3L) in children and adolescents with scoliosis.

Jiaer Lin, Carlos King Ho Wong, Jason Pui Yin Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang Cheung, Nan Luo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Health-related quality of life and medication use among individuals with Angelman syndrome.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L and CHU9D in children and adolescents: a measurement property study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of the EQ-5D-Y and the CHU-9D instruments in a general child population based on self-reports and proxy-reports.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-Y in children with haematological malignancies and their caregivers.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  13. Validation of the EQ-5D-Y-5L parent-proxy version among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jiaer LinJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Carlos King Ho WongDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Rm 1‑01, 1/F, Jockey Club Building for Interdisciplinary Research, 5 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. carlosho@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-6071
Jason Pui Yin CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F Professorial Block, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. cheungjp@hku.hk.
Prudence Wing Hang CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F Professorial Block, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Nan LuoSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Queen Mary Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHong Kong Jockey Club · CNNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

EuroQol Research Foundation 20190250General Research Fund #17119518General Research Fund #17156416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the psychometric performance of proxy-reported EQ-5D-Y-5L (Y-5L) in comparisons with EQ-5D-Y-3L (Y-3L) administered by caregivers of patients with juvenile (JIS) or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

methodsA consecutive sample of caregivers of JIS or AIS patients were recruited. Redistribution property, ceiling effects, and discriminative power were examined. Known-group validity was determined by examining their ability to detect differences across clinical known groups. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for EQ-VAS score and Gwet's agreement coefficient (GAC) and percentage agreement (PA) for dimension responses. Furthermore, subgroups were analyzed for comparing test-retest reliability.

resultsA total of 130 caregivers were involved in the study. Consistencies between proxy-reported Y-3L and Y-5L were very high for all dimensions (93.8-99.2%). The ceiling effect in the Y-5L was slightly reduced in four dimensions (AR: 0.8-2.3%) whereas increased in "Having pain/discomfort". Greater informativity was found in the Y-5L than the Y-3L. In known-group comparisons of curvature magnitude, curvature type, and treatment modality, Y-5L and Y-3L dimension scales showed hypothesized results. For example, more full-health responses were found in the mild Cobb angle group (Y-5L: 63.1%; Y-3L: 62.2%) than the severe Cobb angle group (Y-5L: 55.6%, Y-3L: 55.6%). EQ-VAS score exhibited low test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.41), whereas dimension scales of both instruments showed satisfactory test-retest reliability (GAC ≥ 0.7 and PA ≥ 70% for all). In most known groups, hard-to-observe dimensions were more reliable for proxy-reported Y-5L than Y-3L.

conclusionBoth the proxy-reported Y-5L and Y-3L are valid and reliable instruments for assessing the HRQoL of JIS or AIS patients.

Indexed as

ScoliosisAdolescentChildHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisEQ-5D-Y-3LEQ-5D-Y-5LProxyPsychometric performance

Identifiers

PMID35122171
OpenAlexW4210725123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.