Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35122052›Full record

ReviewNature cancer2020

Discovery through clinical sequencing in oncology.

Mark T A Donoghue, Alison M Schram, David M Hyman, Barry S Taylor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Basket Trials: Past, Present, and Future.Annual review of cancer biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. New update to the guidelines on testing predictive biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark T A DonoghueMarie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alison M SchramDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
David M HymanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Barry S TaylorMarie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. taylorb@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
MSKCC Pilot Center for Precision Disease ModelingU54OD020355 · OD · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LOWE, SCOTT W., SOLIT, DAVID B. · 2015 to 2019
$9.9M
Defining the impact of mutant oncogene zygosityR01CA245069 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHANDARLAPATY, SARAT · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Understanding Long Tail Driver Mutations in CancerR01CA204749 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SCHULTZ, NIKOLAUS · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Targeting AKT-Mutant Human CancersR01CA207244 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SOLIT, DAVID B. · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204749NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207244NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245069NIH HHS U54 OD020355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular characterization of tumors now informs clinical cancer care for many patients. This advent of molecular oncology has been driven by the expanding number of therapeutic biomarkers that can predict sensitivity to both approved agents and investigational agents. Beyond its role in driving clinical-trial enrollments and guiding therapy in individual patients, large-scale clinical genomics in oncology also represents a rapidly expanding research resource for translational scientific discovery. Here we review the progress, opportunities, and challenges of scientific and translational discovery from prospective clinical genomic screening programs now routinely conducted for patients with cancer.

Indexed as

GenomicsNeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyPrecision MedicineProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35122052
PMCPMC8985175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.