ArticleNature cancer2020
Securing the future of the clinician-scientist.
Article in Nature cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strengthening translational medical research in Ireland: an interdisciplinary framework for clinician-scientist collaboration.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- [Expectations and Challenges for Early-Career Academic Surgeons in Surgical Oncology].Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 2026Article
- Invest where impact begins: recommendations from Breast Cancer Research Foundation Early Career Investigator Working Group (Part 1 of 2).NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- From Imaging to Impact: A Multi-Disciplinary T32 Program Framework and Initial Insights for Training in Image-Guided Cancer Therapy [Advance Publication].Advances in cancer education and quality improvement · 2025Article
- Research involvement among undergraduate medical students in Bangladesh: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Structured programs to train the next generation of clinician scientists.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- How we achieve satisfaction in training - A German-wide survey on preferred training conditions among trainers and trainees for board certification in gastroenterology.Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2024Article
- Aligning public and institutional incentives to advance biomedical research.Nature cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional Survey of Medical student perceptions of And desires for Research and Training pathways (SMART): an analysis of prospective cohort study of UK medical students.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Medical students' interest in research: changing trends during university training.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Are medical students interested in research? - students' attitudes towards research.Annals of medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Establishing CREATE: lessons learned in setting up a training environment for early-career researchers in respiratory medicine.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Clinician Data Scientists-Preparing for the Future of Medicine in the Digital World.Health data science · 2022Review
- Training and Retaining Physician‒Scientists in Dermatology: The German Perspective.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022Article
- Konnichiwa: Japanese scientists and their struggle to speak English: More research careers in Japan need less English.EMBO reports · 2021Article
- Ensuring Stakeholder Feedback in the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases: ISCTM Position Paper of the Orphan Disease Working Group.Innovations in clinical neuroscienceReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35122004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.