Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35121955›Full record

ReviewNature cancer2020

Illuminating the noncoding genome in cancer.

Xiaoyang Zhang, Matthew Meyerson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Technologies for engineering repetitive DNA.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoyang ZhangDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Matthew MeyersonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Matthew_Meyerson@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9133-8108
Broad Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

NKX2-1 Enhancer Amplification and Lineage Addiction in Lung AdenocarcinomaR35CA197568 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Matthew L. Meyerson · 2015 to 2026
$12.4M
Investigating the role of KLF5 genomic alterations in tumorigenesisR00CA215244 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ZHANG, XIAOYANG · 2019 to 2021
$742k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA215244NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis requires comprehensive annotation of the cancer genome. The majority of the human genome consists of noncoding regions, harboring functional elements that regulate the expression of protein-coding genes, including proto-oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes. Technologies such as whole-genome and long-read sequencing provide powerful means to identify alterations in the noncoding genome of cancer cells, paving the way for the study of their functional relevance. Recent analyses of noncoding alterations have revealed additional mechanisms underlying tumor development, progression and response to therapies, and uncovered new targets for drug development. Here we highlight recent findings about noncoding alterations, review established and emerging methods and models to study these alterations, and discuss the outlook for noncoding alterations as therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID35121955
PMCPMC9645525
OpenAlexW3085163626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.