Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35121751›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Spontaneous and TMS-related EEG changes as new biomarkers to measure anti-epileptic drug effects.

Andrea Biondi, L Rocchi, V Santoro, P G Rossini, G N Beatch, M P Richardson, I Premoli

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dynamics-informed priors (DIP) for neural mass modelling.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea BiondiDivision of Neuroscience, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Ground Floor (G.33.08), 5 Cutcombe Road, Camberwell, London, SE5 9RX, UK. andrea.2.biondi@kcl.ac.uk.
L RocchiDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
V SantoroDivision of Neuroscience, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Ground Floor (G.33.08), 5 Cutcombe Road, Camberwell, London, SE5 9RX, UK.
P G RossiniDivision of Neuroscience, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Ground Floor (G.33.08), 5 Cutcombe Road, Camberwell, London, SE5 9RX, UK.
G N BeatchXenon Pharmaceuticals Inc., Burnaby, Canada.
M P Richardson *Division of Neuroscience, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Ground Floor (G.33.08), 5 Cutcombe Road, Camberwell, London, SE5 9RX, UK.
I Premoli *Division of Neuroscience, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Ground Floor (G.33.08), 5 Cutcombe Road, Camberwell, London, SE5 9RX, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Cagliari · ITXenon Pharmaceuticals (Canada) · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K013998/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust biomarkers for anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) activity in the human brain are essential to increase the probability of successful drug development. The frequency analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, either spontaneous or evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS-EEG) can provide cortical readouts for AEDs. However, a systematic evaluation of the effect of AEDs on spontaneous oscillations and TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP) has not yet been provided. We studied the effects of Lamotrigine, Levetiracetam, and of a novel potassium channel opener (XEN1101) in two groups of healthy volunteers. Levetiracetam suppressed TRSP theta, alpha and beta power, whereas Lamotrigine decreased delta and theta but increased the alpha power. Finally, XEN1101 decreased TRSP delta, theta, alpha and beta power. Resting-state EEG showed a decrease of theta band power after Lamotrigine intake. Levetiracetam increased theta, beta and gamma power, while XEN1101 produced an increase of delta, theta, beta and gamma power. Spontaneous and TMS-related cortical oscillations represent a powerful tool to characterize the effect of AEDs on in vivo brain activity. Spectral fingerprints of specific AEDs should be further investigated to provide robust and objective biomarkers of biological effect in human clinical trials.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAnticonvulsantsBrain WavesCerebral CortexHealthy VolunteersHumansLamotrigineLevetiracetamMaleOrganic ChemicalsYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsLamotrigineLevetiracetamOrganic ChemicalsXEN1101

Identifiers

PMID35121751
PMCPMC8817040
OpenAlexW4210650684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.