Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35121638›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2022

Effectiveness of electronic drug monitoring feedback to increase adherence in patients with RA initiating a biological DMARD: a randomised clinical trial.

Renske Cf Hebing, Iremnur Aksu, Jos Wr Twisk, Wouter Bos, Bart Van den Bemt, Michael T Nurmohamed

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Innovative Approaches to Enhance and Measure Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease Management: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Renske Cf HebingRheumatology, Pharmacy, Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands r.hebing@reade.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-6719
Iremnur AksuReade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos Wr TwiskDepartment of Methodology and Applied Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter BosRheumatology, Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart Van den BemtPharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek Afdeling Reumatologie, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michael T NurmohamedRheumatology and Internal Medicine, Reade Hoofdlocatie Dr Jan van Breemenstraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6274-1934
Reade · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMedication non-adherence in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with disease flares, increased disability and increased costs. This study assessed the effectiveness of electronic monitoring feedback (EMF) on medication adherence in patients with RA starting with or switching to a new biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD).

methodsIn this randomised controlled trial, bDMARD starters were assigned to the intervention or control group and followed for 1 year. The intervention group received a needle container with a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) cap registering patient's adherence to injections. Scores were calculated every 3 months with MEMS and motivational interviewing feedback was given. The control group received usual care. Effectiveness of EMF on adherence was measured with the medication possession ratio (MPR).

results104 consecutive intervention patients were included and 102 controls. MPR was 0.95 (SD: 0.10) and 0.90 (0.16) after 12 months (B: 0.036, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.007, p=0.045). bDMARD-naive patients receiving EMF achieved low disease activity (LDA) sooner compared with the control group, adjusted for baseline DAS (HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.00 to 2.81, p=0.050). Side effects and DAS28 were similar.

conclusionEMF increased adherence for patients with RA starting with or switching to a bDMARD. Especially bDMARD-naive patients achieved LDA sooner compared with the control group, which holds promise for the future.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDrug MonitoringElectronicsFeedbackHumansAntirheumatic Agentsarthritisbiological therapyrheumatoidtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID35121638
PMCPMC8819786
OpenAlexW4213280324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.