Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35121385›Full record

SynthesisBehaviour research and therapy2022

Autobiographical memory style and clinical outcomes following mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT): An individual patient data meta-analysis.

Caitlin Hitchcock, Judita Rudokaite, Christina Haag, Shivam D Patel, Alicia J Smith, Isla Kuhn, Francoise Jermann, S Helen Ma, Willem Kuyken, J MarkG Williams and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Behaviour research and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Emotion regulation modulates subsequent control of unwanted memories.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Caitlin HitchcockMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Caitlin.hitchcock@unimelb.edu.au.
Judita RudokaiteMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Christina HaagMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Shivam D PatelMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Alicia J SmithMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Isla KuhnSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
Francoise JermannDepartment of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospital, USA.
S Helen MaMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Willem KuykenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
J MarkG WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Edward WatkinsPsychology, University of Exeter, UK.
Claudi L H BocktingAmsterdam Medical University Centres and Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Catherine CraneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
David FisherMRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, UK.
Tim DalgleishMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBGeneva College · USMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105579215Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to retrieve specific, single-incident autobiographical memories has been consistently posited as a predictor of recurrent depression. Elucidating the role of autobiographical memory specificity in patient-response to depressive treatments may improve treatment efficacy and facilitate use of science-driven interventions. We used recent methodological advances in individual patient data meta-analysis to determine a) whether memory specificity is improved following mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), relative to control interventions, and b) whether pre-treatment memory specificity moderates treatment response. All bar one study evaluated MBCT for relapse prevention for depression. Our initial analysis therefore focussed on MBCT datasets only(n = 708), then were repeated including the additional dataset(n = 880). Memory specificity did not significantly differ from baseline to post-treatment for either MBCT and Control interventions. There was no evidence that baseline memory specificity predicted treatment response in terms of symptom-levels, or risk of relapse. Findings raise important questions regarding the role of memory specificity in depressive treatments.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMajor Depressive DisorderMemory, EpisodicMindfulnessHumansTreatment OutcomeAutobiographical memoryCogntive therapyIndividual patient data meta-analysisMindfulnessTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID35121385
PMCPMC7613018
OpenAlexW4210761880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.