Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35121268›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2022

Commercial Interferon-gamma release assay to assess the immune response to first and second doses of mRNA vaccine in previously COVID-19 infected versus uninfected individuals.

Nuria Tormo, David Navalpotro, María Martínez-Serrano, Marta Moreno, Fernando Grosson, Irene Tur, Maria Remedios Guna, Pepa Soriano, Ana Tornero, Concepción Gimeno

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of the T cell and B cell response following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines in Korea.Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nuria TormoMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: nuriatormo@hotmail.com.
David NavalpotroMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
María Martínez-SerranoMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Marta MorenoMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Fernando GrossonMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Irene TurMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Maria Remedios GunaMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Pepa SorianoControl Commission of Nursing Homes, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Ana TorneroControl Commission of Nursing Homes, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Concepción GimenoMicrobiology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario De Valencia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analysed immunological response during vaccination by using quantitative anti-spike IgG antibodies (qAbs) and Interferon-gamma (IFNγ) production by SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (QuantiFERON® assay). Blood samples were collected at four time points: a day before the reception of first (T0) and second (T1) BNT162b2 doses, 14 (T2) and 28 days (T3) after second dose. Fifty individuals were included: 34 previously infected by SARS-CoV-2 (CoV2+) and 16 that were not (CoV2-). Among CoV2+, we only observed significant differences after the first dose in both qAbs and IFNγ+ T cells. CoV2- showed differences after each dose, and the response was lower than CoV2+. Older people presented a higher response in CoV2+, while in CoV2, young people responded best. Our results suggest that the second BNT162b2 vaccine dose is not a priority in people with previous COVID-19. QuantiFERON® is a good option to monitor T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAgedAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunityInterferon-gamma Release TestsmRNA VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesVaccines, SyntheticCOVID-19IFNγ release assayImmune responsemRNA vaccineSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35121268
PMCPMC8502494
OpenAlexW3207948936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.