Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35121181›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Differentiation of speech-induced artifacts from physiological high gamma activity in intracranial recordings.

Alan Bush, Anna Chrabaszcz, Victoria Peterson, Varun Saravanan, Christina Dastolfo-Hromack, Witold J Lipski, R Mark Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alan BushBrain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 225 Charles St, 02114 Thier Research Building, Suite 429, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: alan.bush@mgh.harvard.edu.
Anna ChrabaszczDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Victoria PetersonBrain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 225 Charles St, 02114 Thier Research Building, Suite 429, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Varun SaravananBrain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 225 Charles St, 02114 Thier Research Building, Suite 429, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Christina Dastolfo-HromackDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; West Virginia University, Communication Science and Disorders, WV 26506, USA.
Witold J LipskiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
R Mark RichardsonBrain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 225 Charles St, 02114 Thier Research Building, Suite 429, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Cortical-Basal Ganglia Speech NetworksU01NS117836 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK · 2020 to 2024
$5.8M
Subthalamic and corticosubthalamic coding of speech productionU01NS098969 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK · 2016 to 2018
$3.3M
CRCNS: Deep Neural Network Approaches for Closed-Loop Deep Brain StimulationR01NS110424 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK, TURNER, ROBERT STERLING · 2018 to 2020
$673k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110424NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098969NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS117836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is great interest in identifying the neurophysiological underpinnings of speech production. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is unique in that it allows intracranial recordings from both cortical and subcortical regions in patients who are awake and speaking. The quality of these recordings, however, may be affected to various degrees by mechanical forces resulting from speech itself. Here we describe the presence of speech-induced artifacts in local-field potential (LFP) recordings obtained from mapping electrodes, DBS leads, and cortical electrodes. In addition to expected physiological increases in high gamma (60-200 Hz) activity during speech production, time-frequency analysis in many channels revealed a narrowband gamma component that exhibited a pattern similar to that observed in the speech audio spectrogram. This component was present to different degrees in multiple types of neural recordings. We show that this component tracks the fundamental frequency of the participant's voice, correlates with the power spectrum of speech and has coherence with the produced speech audio. A vibration sensor attached to the stereotactic frame recorded speech-induced vibrations with the same pattern observed in the LFPs. No corresponding component was identified in any neural channel during the listening epoch of a syllable repetition task. These observations demonstrate how speech-induced vibrations can create artifacts in the primary frequency band of interest. Identifying and accounting for these artifacts is crucial for establishing the validity and reproducibility of speech-related data obtained from intracranial recordings during DBS surgery.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDeep Brain StimulationElectrocorticographySpeechAgedAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodMaleParkinson DiseaseArtifactDeep brain stimulationElectrocorticographyHigh gammaIntracranial recordingsIntraoperative researchLocal field potentialsSpeech

Identifiers

PMID35121181
PMCPMC8922158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.