ArticleNeuroImage2022
Differentiation of speech-induced artifacts from physiological high gamma activity in intracranial recordings.
Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Fine-grained Spatiotemporal ECoG Dataset during Speech Perception in Tonal Language.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Distributed cortico-subcortical networks enable robust speech state detection from sparse intracranial recordings.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Spike-phase coupling of subthalamic neurons to posterior perisylvian cortex predicts speech sound accuracy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Subthalamic nucleus neurons encode syllable sequence and phonetic characteristics during speech.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Stability of ECoG high gamma signals during speech and implications for a speech BCI system in an individual with ALS: a year-long longitudinal study.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Aperiodic components of local field potentials reflect inherent differences between cortical and subcortical activity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- A supervised data-driven spatial filter denoising method for speech artifacts in intracranial electrophysiological recordings.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Stable Decoding from a Speech BCI Enables Control for an Individual with ALS without Recalibration for 3 Months.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Speech artifact is also present in spike data.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices.NeuroImage · 2022Review
- Proceedings of the 10th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: Advances in cutting edge technologies, artificial intelligence, neuromodulation, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, and women in neuromodulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is great interest in identifying the neurophysiological underpinnings of speech production. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is unique in that it allows intracranial recordings from both cortical and subcortical regions in patients who are awake and speaking. The quality of these recordings, however, may be affected to various degrees by mechanical forces resulting from speech itself. Here we describe the presence of speech-induced artifacts in local-field potential (LFP) recordings obtained from mapping electrodes, DBS leads, and cortical electrodes. In addition to expected physiological increases in high gamma (60-200 Hz) activity during speech production, time-frequency analysis in many channels revealed a narrowband gamma component that exhibited a pattern similar to that observed in the speech audio spectrogram. This component was present to different degrees in multiple types of neural recordings. We show that this component tracks the fundamental frequency of the participant's voice, correlates with the power spectrum of speech and has coherence with the produced speech audio. A vibration sensor attached to the stereotactic frame recorded speech-induced vibrations with the same pattern observed in the LFPs. No corresponding component was identified in any neural channel during the listening epoch of a syllable repetition task. These observations demonstrate how speech-induced vibrations can create artifacts in the primary frequency band of interest. Identifying and accounting for these artifacts is crucial for establishing the validity and reproducibility of speech-related data obtained from intracranial recordings during DBS surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.