Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120581›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Dental antibiotic stewardship: study protocol for developing international consensus on a core outcome set.

Wendy Thompson, Leanne Teoh, Céline Pulcini, David Williams, Carole Pitkeathley, Vanessa Carter, Susie Sanderson, Glauco Torres, Tanya Walsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How decisions are made: Antibiotic stewardship in dentistry.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Antibiotics in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of the Evidence beyond the Myth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Managing Oral Health in the Context of Antimicrobial Resistance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Moving the needle on dental antibiotic overuse in Canada post COVID-19.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Wendy ThompsonDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. wendy.thompson-2@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-4087
Leanne TeohMelbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Céline PulciniUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France.
David WilliamsInstitute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Carole Pitkeathley, Blythe, UK.
Vanessa Carter, Torquay, UK.
Susie SandersonBritish Dental Association, London, UK.
Glauco Torres, London, UK.
Tanya WalshDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBBlyth Community Hospital · GBBritish Dental Association · GBInterdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est · FRQueen Mary University of London · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is both a global public health and patient safety problem driven by overprescribing of antibiotic and other antimicrobial drugs. To conserve the effectiveness of antibiotics for future generations, antibiotic stewardship approaches to using them only where appropriate and necessary are advocated. Dentistry accounts for about 10% of antibiotic prescriptions across global healthcare, with 80% not in accordance with guidance in some countries. Core outcome sets enable the results of studies to be compared in order to maximise the value which can be derived from them. The aim of this study is to develop an international consensus on a core outcome set for dental antibiotic stewardship.

methodsConsensus on outcomes which are critical for inclusion in the core outcome set for dental antibiotic stewardship will be sought through two rounds of a Delphi survey (using the DelphiManager online system) followed by a final online consensus meeting. Thirty participants will be recruited to the Delphi Panel from across three stakeholder groups: ten dentists, ten academics and ten adults experienced with dental antibiotics as either a patient or parent/carer of a patient who has been prescribed them. Consensus will be achieved if more than 70% of the panel agree that an outcome is critical, with at least one from each stakeholder group in agreement. A long-list of candidate core outcomes has been developed from previously published studies with additions recommended by the steering group. The steering group will oversee development of the core outcome set and includes people from around the world with experience of dental antibiotics: clinicians, researchers and people with experience of being prescribed dental antibiotics and/or surviving an antibiotic resistant infection. DISCUSSION: To date, few studies of dental antibiotic stewardship have been published. Internationally, dental antibiotic guidelines and patterns of use vary widely, so a core outcome set is particularly important to facilitate meaningful comparisons between studies. This core outcome set will encompass antibiotic prescribing for both therapeutic indications, such as for people with acute infections, and for prophylactic indications, such as the prevention of distant site infections (like infective endocarditis) following dental procedures.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipAdultConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicDelphi TechniqueHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignResearch PersonnelAntibioticCore outcome setDentalPrescribingResistanceStewardship

Identifiers

PMID35120581
PMCPMC8817512
OpenAlexW4210373207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.