Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120561›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

DNA-based quantification and counting of transmission stages provides different but complementary parasite load estimates: an example from rodent coccidia (Eimeria).

Víctor Hugo Jarquín-Díaz, Alice Balard, Susana Carolina Martins Ferreira, Vivian Mittné, Julia Mari Murata, Emanuel Heitlinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Víctor Hugo Jarquín-DíazInstitute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany. vhjarquind@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3758-1091
Alice BalardInstitute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Susana Carolina Martins FerreiraInstitute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Vivian MittnéInstitute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Julia Mari MurataInstitute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Emanuel HeitlingerInstitute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 285969495/HE 7320/2-1Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin ProjectDEAL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCounting parasite transmission stages in faeces is the classical measurement to quantify "parasite load". DNA-based quantifications of parasite intensities from faecal samples are relatively novel and often validated against such counts. When microscopic and molecular quantifications do not correlate, it is unclear whether oocyst counts or DNA-based intensity better reflects biologically meaningful concepts. Here, we investigate this issue using the example of Eimeria ferrisi (Coccidia), an intracellular parasite of house mice (Mus musculus).

methodsWe performed an infection experiment of house mice with E. ferrisi, in which the intensity of infection correlates with increased health impact on the host, measured as temporary weight loss during infection. We recorded the number of parasite transmissive stages (oocysts) per gram of faeces (OPG) and, as a DNA-based measurement, the number of Eimeria genome copies per gram of faeces for 10 days post-infection (dpi). We assessed weight loss relative to the day of experimental infection as a proxy of host health and evaluated whether DNA or oocyst counts are better predictors of host health.

resultsAbsolute quantification of Eimeria DNA and oocyst counts showed similar but slightly diverging temporal patterns during 10 dpi. We detected Eimeria DNA earlier than the first appearance of oocysts in faeces. Additionally, Eimeria OPGs within each dpi did not explain parasite DNA intensity. Early dpi were characterized by high DNA intensity with low oocyst counts, while late infections showed the opposite pattern. The intensity of Eimeria DNA was consistently a stronger predictor of either maximal weight loss (1 value per animal during the infection course) or weight loss on each day during the experiment when controlling for between-dpi and between-individual variance.

conclusionsEimeria ferrisi oocyst counts correlate weakly with parasite intensity assessed through DNA quantification. DNA is likely partially derived from life-cycle stages other than transmissive oocysts. DNA-based intensities predict health outcomes of infection for the host more robustly than counts of transmissive stages. We conclude that DNA-based quantifications should not necessarily require validation against counts of transmissive stages. Instead, DNA-based load estimates should be evaluated as complementary sources of information with potential specific biological relevance for each host-parasite system.

Indexed as

CoccidiosisEimeriaAnimalsDNAFecesMiceOocystsParasite LoadRodentiaDNAEimeriaOocystsParasite loadqPCRResistance

Identifiers

PMID35120561
PMCPMC8815199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.