Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120543›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2022

Transfer of knowledge to diagnose infant abuse and its incidence - a time-series analysis from Sweden.

Ulf Högberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Spread of "triad diagnostics" in suspected Shaken Baby Syndrome.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ulf HögbergDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. ulf.hogberg@kbh.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2121-7511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyse the transfer of knowledge on how to detect physical abuse, especially shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma (SBS/AHT), and its association to trends in infant abuse diagnoses (maltreatment and assault).

methodsDesign: retrospective population-based and quasi-experimental.

settingSweden 1987-2019. PATIENTS: Children below age 1 year, selected from the National Patient Register (n = 1150). Exposures: Literature search for transfer of knowledge by diffusion, dissemination and implementation, and whether supportive or disruptive of the SBS/AHT paradigm.

main outcome measureAbuse diagnoses (maltreatment or assault). ANALYSES: Incidence rate, incidence rate ratio (IRR).

resultsThe overall incidence rate of abuse was 32.23 per 100,000 during the years 1987-2019. It was rather stable 1987-2000. The SBS diagnosis was introduced in the late 1990s. A comprehensive increase of transfer of knowledge on physical abuse, specifically on SBS/AHT and dangers of shaking, took place from 2002 and onward through diffusion, dissemination and implementation. Maltreatment diagnoses, but not assault diagnosis, increased steeply during 2002-2007, peaking in 2008-2013 [IRR 1.63 (95% confidence interval 1.34-1.98)]. Transfer of disruptive knowledge on SBS/AHT during the period 2014-2019 was associated with a decline in maltreatment diagnoses [IRR 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.99)].

conclusionAn increase in maltreatment diagnoses was associated with transfer of supportive knowledge of the SBS/AHT paradigm, while a decline occurred toward the end of the study period, which might indicate a burgeoning de-implementation process.

Indexed as

Child AbuseCraniocerebral TraumaShaken Baby SyndromeChildHumansIncidenceInfantRetrospective StudiesSwedenAbuseImplementation scienceInfantKnowledgeProfessional practiceShaken baby syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35120543
PMCPMC8815122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.