Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120541›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2022

Cost, cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness evaluation of a practice change intervention to increase routine provision of antenatal care addressing maternal alcohol consumption.

Zoe Szewczyk, Penny Reeves, Melanie Kingsland, Emma Doherty, Elizabeth Elliott, Luke Wolfenden, Tracey W Tsang, Adrian Dunlop, Andrew Searles, John Wiggers

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Pilot Economic Evaluation of a Nature-Based Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Austria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zoe SzewczykHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia. Zoe.szewczyk@hmri.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0036-1549
Penny ReevesHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Melanie KingslandHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Emma DohertyHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth ElliottSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Tracey W TsangSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Adrian DunlopSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
John WiggersHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of antenatal clinical guideline recommendations for addressing maternal alcohol consumption is sub-optimal. There is a complete absence of evidence of the cost and cost-effectiveness of delivering practice change interventions addressing maternal alcohol consumption amongst women accessing maternity services. The study sought to determine the cost, cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness of developing and delivering a multi-strategy practice change intervention in three sectors of a health district in New South Wales, Australia.

methodsThe trial-based economic analyses compared the costs and outcomes of the intervention to usual care over the 35-month period of the stepped-wedge trial. A health service provider perspective was selected to focus on the cost of delivering the practice change intervention, rather than the cost of delivering antenatal care itself. All costs are reported in Australian dollars ($AUD, 2019). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed the effect of variation in intervention effect and costs.

resultsThe total cost of delivering the practice change intervention across all three sectors was $367,646, of which $40,871 (11%) were development costs and $326,774 (89%) were delivery costs. Labour costs comprised 70% of the total intervention delivery cost. A single practice change strategy, 'educational meetings and educational materials' contributed 65% of the delivery cost. Based on the trial's primary efficacy outcome, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio was calculated to be $32,570 (95% CI: $32,566-$36,340) per percent increase in receipt of guideline recommended care. Based on the number of women attending the maternity services during the trial period, the average incremental cost per woman who received all guideline elements was $591 (Range: $329 - $940) . The average cost of the intervention per eligible clinician was $993 (Range: $640-$1928).

conclusionThe intervention was more effective than usual care, at an increased cost. Healthcare funders' willingness to pay for this incremental effect is unknown. However, the strategic investment in systems change is expected to improve the efficiency of the practice change intervention over time. Given the positive trial findings, further research and monitoring is required to assess the sustainability of intervention effectiveness and whether economies of scale, or reduced costs of intervention delivery can be achieved without impact on outcomes.

trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, No. ACTRN12617000882325 (date registered: 16/06/2017).

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingPrenatal CareAustraliaCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansPregnancyalcohol drinkingcosteconomic evaluationhealth serviceimplementationmaternal and child

Identifiers

PMID35120541
PMCPMC8815123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.