ArticleBMC public health2022
Prevalence and factors associated with lipid-lowering medications use for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases among Malaysians: the REDISCOVER study.
Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factor Assessments and Lipid Management Patterns in Hospitalised Patients in Malaysia: The Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Study.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2025Article
- Statin Utilization for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Developing First ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Malaysian Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Five-year trend in secondary prevention medication prescription and risk factor control among patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in Perak health clinics.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024Article
- Impact of Active vs Passive Statin Selection for Primary Prevention: The CorCal Vanguard Trial.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Can Cardiometabolic Risk Be Reduced in the Elderly? Comprehensive Epidemiological Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Safety and efficacy of oil palm phenolic supplementation in improving lipid profile among hyperlipidemic adults: a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Physical Activity in Malaysia: Are We Doing Enough? Findings from the REDISCOVER Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Undertreatment and Underachievement of LDL-C Target among Individuals with High and Very High Cardiovascular Risk in the Malaysian Community.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- TheInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLipid-lowering medications (LLM) are commonly used for secondary prevention, as well as for primary prevention among patients with high global cardiovascular risk and with diabetes. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of LLM use among high-risk individuals [participants with diabetes, high Framingham general cardiovascular (FRS-CVD) score, existing cardiovascular disease (CVD)] and the factors associated with it.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional analysis from the baseline recruitment (years 2007 to 2011) of an ongoing prospective study involving 11,288 participants from 40 rural and urban communities in Malaysia. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with LLM use.
resultsMajority (74.2%) of participants with CVD were not on LLM. Only 10.5% of participants with high FRS-CVD score, and 17.1% with diabetes were on LLM. Participants who were obese (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.15-2.83), have diabetes (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.78-3.19), have hypertension (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 2.09-3.95), and attained tertiary education (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.06-4.78) were more likely to be on LLM. Rural residents had lower odds of being on LLM (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.82). In the primary prevention group, participants with high FRS-CVD score (OR = 3.81, 95% CI: 2.78-5.23) and high-income earners (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.06-2.24) had higher odds of being on LLM.
conclusionsLLM use among high CVD-risk individuals in the primary prevention group, and also among individuals with existing CVD was low. While CVD risk factors and global cardiovascular risk score were positively associated with LLM use, sociodemographic disparities were observed among the less-educated, rural residents and low-income earners. Measures are needed to ensure optimal and equitable use of LLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.