Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120444›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

Candida albicans Infections: a novel porcine wound model to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Joel Gil, Michael Solis, Alexander Higa, Stephen C Davis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. StudyingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lecithin and Chitosan as Building Blocks in Anti-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. An experimental porcine model of invasive candidiasis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Porcine Wound Models: The Gold Standard for Translational Research in Cutaneous Healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel GilMiller School of Medicine, Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery Wound Healing Research Laboratory Miami, University of Miami, Miami, 33136, FL, United States. jgil@med.miami.edu.
Michael SolisMiller School of Medicine, Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery Wound Healing Research Laboratory Miami, University of Miami, Miami, 33136, FL, United States.
Alexander HigaMiller School of Medicine, Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery Wound Healing Research Laboratory Miami, University of Miami, Miami, 33136, FL, United States.
Stephen C DavisMiller School of Medicine, Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery Wound Healing Research Laboratory Miami, University of Miami, Miami, 33136, FL, United States.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida albicans is a common cause of opportunistic mycoses worldwide and a major contributor in wound infections. The purpose of this study was to establish a fungal wound model and analyze the effects of a common antifungal agent against the proliferation of three C. albicans strains. Second degree burns were created, and then inoculated with one of three different C. albicans ATCC strains: 10261 reference strain, 64550 fluconazole resistant and 26310 fluconazole sensitive. After fungal inoculation, every wound was covered with dressings for 4 h to allow fungal colonization on every wound bed. After 4 h, the dressings were removed, and each wound was treated either once or twice daily with a topical terbinafine hydrochloride or left untreated. On days 2, 4 and 7 post inoculation, three wounds from each treatment group were scrub cultured and quantified. On day 2, wounds infected with the sensitive strains 26310 and 10261 and treated twice showed a significant reduction when compared against those infected wounds receiving once daily treatment. On day 4, wounds which were infected with C. albicans fluconazole sensitive (ATCC 26310) showed a significant reduction in fungal cell counts with treatment applied twice daily. A significant reduction in the colony counts was exhibited in all three strains at the seventh day with active as compared to the non-treated wounds. Twice daily treatment resulted in a lower fungal count than once daily treatment. Neither treatment was able to entirely eradicate C. albicans during the duration of this study. Establishing a reliable fungal wound model will help in the translational goal of identifying new antifungal that could be used clinically by wound care providers.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalSwineAnimalsAntifungal AgentsBandagesCandida albicansCandidiasisDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsTreatment OutcomeAntifungal AgentsAntifungalBiofilm modelBurnsCandida albicansInfectionNew modelPorcinePorcine modelWoundYeast

Identifiers

PMID35120444
PMCPMC8815218
OpenAlexW4210535894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.