Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120345›Full record

ArticleBiofabrication2022

Computational investigation of interface printing patterns within 3D printed multilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Robert Choe, Eoin Devoy, Blake Kuzemchak, Mary Sherry, Erfan Jabari, Jonathan D Packer, John P Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofabrication, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Materials today. Bio · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert ChoeFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4834-4529
Eoin DevoyFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America.
Blake KuzemchakFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America.
Mary SherryFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America.
Erfan JabariFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America.
Jonathan D PackerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.
John P FisherFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America.

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FISHER, JOHN P · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent rheumatic musculoskeletal disorder that commonly affects many joints. Repetitive joint overloading perpetuates the damage to the affected cartilage, which undermines the structural integrity of the osteochondral unit. Various tissue engineering strategies have been employed to design multiphasic osteochondral scaffolds that recapitulate layer-specific biomechanical properties, but the inability to fully satisfy mechanical demands within the joint has limited their success. Through computational modeling and extrusion-based bioprinting, we attempted to fabricate a biphasic osteochondral scaffold with improved shear properties and a mechanically strong interface. A 3D stationary solid mechanics model was developed to simulate the effect of lateral shear force on various thermoplastic polymer/hydrogel scaffolds with a patterned interface. Additionally, interfacial shear tests were performed on bioprinted polycaprolactone (PCL)/hydrogel interface scaffolds. The first simulation showed that the PCL/gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and PCL/polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) scaffolds interlocking hydrogel and PCL at interface in a 1:1 ratio possessed the largest average tensile (PCL/GelMA: 80.52 kPa; PCL/PEGDA: 79.75 kPa) and compressive stress (PCL/GelMA: 74.71 kPa; PCL/PEGDA: 73.83 kPa). Although there were significant differences in shear strength between PCL/GelMA and PCL/PEGDA scaffolds, no significant difference was observed among the treatment groups within both scaffold types. Lastly, the hypothetical simulations of potential biphasic 3D printed scaffolds showed that for every order of magnitude decrease in Young's modulus (

Indexed as

BioprintingTissue EngineeringGelatinHydrogelsMethacrylatesPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsGelatinHydrogelsMethacrylates3D bioprintingcomputational modelingosteochondral interface

Identifiers

PMID35120345
PMCPMC8918066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.