Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120298›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2022

Work Setting Effects on Speech-Language Pathology Practice: Implications for Identification of Children With Specific Language Impairment.

Claire M Selin, Mabel L Rice, Teresa M Girolamo, Chien J Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire M SelinDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.ORCID 0000-0002-8392-5708
Mabel L RiceChild Language Doctoral Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence.ORCID 0000-0002-8150-5523
Teresa M GirolamoCognitive Neuroscience of Communication, University of Connecticut, Storrs.ORCID 0000-0003-1714-3545
Chien J WangPearson, San Antonio, TX.
Google (United States) · USPearson (United States) · US

Funding

MORPHOSYNTACTIC ABILITIES OF SLI PROBANDS AND FAMILIESR01DC001803 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI RICE, MABEL L · 1993 to 2022
$10.9M
TRAINING RESEARCHERS IN LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENTST32DC000052 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI RICE, MABEL L · 1995 to 2022
$2.7M
Training in the Cognitive Neuroscience of CommunicationT32DC017703 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Inge-Marie Eigsti, Emily B Myers · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
Creating the Next Generation of Scholars in CM Science (CMT32)T32HD101390 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Erika Lunkenheimer, Hannah Milena Caroline Schreier · 2020 to 2026
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD101390NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001803NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000052NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC017703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost research on language acquisition and impairments is neutral to work setting; however, work settings (e.g., schools, health care) are expected to differ in alignment with overlaid workplace models (e.g., education, medical). These differences may affect clinical service provision for individuals with specific language impairment (SLI). This article evaluates potential effects of work setting on top-down advocacy initiatives and clinical service provision for children with symptoms of SLI.

methodSpeech-language pathologists serving pediatric populations in health care-based (

resultsThe work setting groups reported differences in eligibility terminology, eligibility criteria, and practice patterns from the point of referral through discharge. The reported differences aligned with overlaid workplace models. As compared to the school-based group, health care-based participants reported fewer eligibility restrictions in the workplace, agreed more often with a belief in less restrictive eligibility criteria, and reported more sensitive clinical decisions when operating under neutral workplace circumstances. Despite these findings, health care-based participants reported a smaller proportion of individuals with language impairment only on their caseload. DISCUSSION: Work setting variations influence the underidentification of individuals with SLI for speech-language pathology services. Differences in responses by workplace indicate the need for unique and targeted advocacy efforts. Shifting diagnostic terminology and criteria will be insufficient in closing the gap unless advocacy efforts also address speech-language pathologists' workplace realities.

Indexed as

Language DisordersSpecific Language DisorderSpeech-Language PathologyChildHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID35120298
PMCPMC9150684
OpenAlexW4210699990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.