Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35120163›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Acceptance rate and risk perception towards the COVID-19 vaccine in Botswana.

Lebapotswe B Tlale, Lesego Gabaitiri, Lorato K Totolo, Gomolemo Smith, Orapeleng Puswane-Katse, Eunice Ramonna, Basego Mothowaeng, John Tlhakanelo, Tiny Masupe, Goabaone Rankgoane-Pono and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lebapotswe B TlaleMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID 0000-0001-5689-2755
Lesego GabaitiriBotswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana.
Lorato K TotoloMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.
Gomolemo SmithMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.
Orapeleng Puswane-KatseMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.
Eunice RamonnaMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.
Basego MothowaengMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.
John TlhakaneloBotswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana.
Tiny MasupeBotswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana.
Goabaone Rankgoane-PonoMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-8412
John IrigeFHI 360, Gaborone, Botswana.
Faith MafaMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.
Samuel KolaneMinistry of Health and Wellness, Gaborone, Botswana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 disease burden continues to be high worldwide and vaccines continue to be developed to help combat the pandemic. Acceptance and risk perception for COVID-19 vaccines is unknown in Botswana despite the government's decision to roll out the vaccine nationally.

objectivesThis study aims to assess the acceptance rate and risk perception of COVID-19 vaccines amongst the general population in Botswana.

methodsWe interviewed 5300 adults in Botswana from 1-28 February 2021 using self-administered questionnaires. The main outcomes of the study were vaccine acceptance and hesitancy rates. Demographic, experiential and socio-cultural factors were explored for their association with outcome variables.

resultsTwo-thirds of the participants were females (3199), with those aged 24-54 making the highest proportion (61%). The acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccine was 73.4% (95% CI: 72.2%-74.6%) with vaccine hesitancy at 31.3% (95% CI: 30.0%-32.6%). When the dependent variable was vaccine acceptance, males had higher odds of accepting the vaccine compared to females (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.4). Individuals aged 55-64 had high odds of accepting the vaccine compared to those aged 65 and above (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.6, 2.5). The odds of accepting the vaccine for someone with primary school education were about 2.5 times that of an individual with post graduate level of education. Finally, individuals with comorbidities had higher odds (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.5) of accepting the vaccine compared to those without any underlying conditions.

conclusionThis study demonstrated a high acceptance rate for the COVID-19 vaccine and a low risk perception in Botswana. In order to achieve a high vaccine coverage and ensure a successful vaccination process, there is need to target populations with high vaccine hesitancy rates. A qualitative study to assess the factors associated with vaccine acceptance and hesitancy is recommended to provide an in-depth analysis of the findings.

Indexed as

IntentionAdolescentAdultAgedBotswanaComorbidityCost of IllnessCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35120163
PMCPMC8815939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.