Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35119915›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2022

Regulation of Tumor Invasion by the Physical Microenvironment: Lessons from Breast and Brain Cancer.

Garrett F Beeghly, Kwasi Y Amofa, Claudia Fischbach, Sanjay Kumar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bioelectronics forNanotheranostics · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Garrett F BeeghlyNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA; email: cf99@cornell.edu.
Kwasi Y AmofaUniversity of California, Berkeley-University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, California, USA; email: skumar@berkeley.edu.
Claudia FischbachNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA; email: cf99@cornell.edu.
Sanjay KumarUniversity of California, Berkeley-University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, California, USA; email: skumar@berkeley.edu.
Cornell University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Project 3: Physical and Metabolic Constraints of Cancer Cell InvasionU54CA210184 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LAMMERDING, JAN · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Biophysical Control of Cell Form and Function by Single Actomyosin Stress Fibers: Instrument SupplementR01GM122375 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KUMAR, SANJAY · 2017 to 2025
$2.7M
Modeling and druggable-genome screening of glioblastoma invasion using regional biopsy-guided biomaterials systemsR01CA227136 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AGHI, MANISH · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Mechanisms of adhesion and invasion in hyaluronic acid matricesR01CA260443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KUMAR, SANJAY · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS R01 CA227136NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260443NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210184NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of anticancer therapies is often limited by heterogeneity within and between tumors. While much attention has been devoted to understanding the intrinsic molecular diversity of tumor cells, the surrounding tissue microenvironment is also highly complex and coevolves with tumor cells to drive clinical outcomes. Here, we propose that diverse types of solid tumors share common physical motifs that change in time and space, serving as universal regulators of malignancy. We use breast cancer and glioblastoma as instructive examples and highlight how invasion in both diseases is driven by the appropriation of structural guidance cues, contact-dependent heterotypic interactions with stromal cells, and elevated interstitial fluid pressure and flow. We discuss how engineering strategies show increasing value for measuring and modeling these physical propertiesfor mechanistic studies. Moreover, engineered systems offer great promise for developing and testing novel therapies that improve patient prognosis by normalizing the physical tumor microenvironment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessTumor Microenvironmentbreast cancerengineering strategiesglioblastomamechanobiologyphysical microenvironmenttumor invasion

Identifiers

PMID35119915
PMCPMC9177572
OpenAlexW4210246198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.