Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35119565›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular pediatrics2022

Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic patterns of aminoglycoside resistance in the Gram-negative bacteria isolates collected from pediatric and general hospitals.

Leila Azimi, Shahnaz Armin, Hossein Samadi Kafil, Nafiseh Abdollahi, Kiarash Ghazvini, Sepide Hasanzadeh, Shahram Shahraki Zahedani, Sedigheh Rafiei Tabatabaei, Fatemeh Fallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antibiotics Resistance Profile of Clinical Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A review of the mechanisms that confer antibiotic resistance in pathotypes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leila AzimiPediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P. Box, Tehran, 19857-17443, Iran.
Shahnaz ArminPediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P. Box, Tehran, 19857-17443, Iran.
Hossein Samadi KafilDrug Applied Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Nafiseh AbdollahiPediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P. Box, Tehran, 19857-17443, Iran.
Kiarash GhazviniDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sepide HasanzadehDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Shahram Shahraki ZahedaniDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Sedigheh Rafiei TabatabaeiPediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P. Box, Tehran, 19857-17443, Iran.
Fatemeh FallahPediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, P. Box, Tehran, 19857-17443, Iran. fafallah@sbmu.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the phenotypic and genotypic patterns of aminoglycoside resistance among the Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolates collected from pediatric and general hospitals in Iran. A total of 836 clinical isolates of GNB were collected from pediatric and general hospitals from January 2018 to the end of December 2019. The identification of bacterial isolates was performed by conventional biochemical tests. Susceptibility to aminoglycosides was evaluated by the disk diffusion method (DDM). The frequency of genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) was screened by the PCR method via specific primers. Among all pediatric and general hospitals, the predominant GNB isolates were Acinetobacter spp. (n = 327) and Escherichia coli (n = 144). However, E. coli (n = 20/144; 13.9%) had the highest frequency in clinical samples collected from pediatrics. The DDM results showed that 64.3% of all GNB were resistant to all of the tested aminoglycoside agents. Acinetobacter spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae with 93.6%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 93.4%, and Enterobacter spp. with 86.5% exhibited very high levels of resistance to gentamicin. Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic against E. coli isolates. In total, the results showed that the aac (6')-Ib gene with 59% had the highest frequency among genes encoding AMEs in GNB. The frequency of the surveyed aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes among all GNB was found as follows: aph (3')-VIe (48.7%), aadA15 (38.6%), aph (3')-Ia (31.3%), aph (3')-II (14.4%), and aph (6) (2.6%). The obtained data demonstrated that the phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance among GNB was quite high and it is possible that the resistance genes may frequently spread among clinical isolates of GNB.

Indexed as

Aminoglycoside resistanceAntibiotic resistanceBacterial infectionGram-negative bacteriaIran

Identifiers

PMID35119565
PMCPMC8816979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.