ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2023
[Balance Evaluation Systems Test: German translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary results on psychometric properties].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Measurement Properties of the BESTest Scale in People With Neurological Conditions: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Physical therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Translation, Adaptation, and Determining the Intra-Rater Reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) for Persian Patients with Chronic Stroke.Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) evaluates balance ability and identifies affected systems associated with balance deficits.
objectiveThe primary objective was the translation and cultural adaptation of the BESTest into German. Secondary objective was the preliminary evaluation of psychometric properties of the BESTest.
methodIn accordance with international guidelines, the BESTest was translated and adapted by a 7-step process. To test the psychometric properties, persons with subjective or objective balance deficits were included. Internal consistency was evaluated by means of Cronbach's alpha. The criterion validity was tested by measuring the correlation with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Construct validity was examined using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC-D) scale and the known groups methods (fallers versus non-fallers).
resultsA total of 27 subjects were included in the testing of the psychometric properties. Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 for the total scale. The correlation of BESTest scores with those of the BBS revealed a Spearmen's ρ of 0.84 (p < 0.001) and 0.61 (p < 0.001) with those of the ABC‑D scale. Fallers and non-fallers showed a trend towards different BESTest scores (p = 0.057). DISCUSSION: This paper provides a German translation of the BESTest authorized by the developer. Our preliminary results confirm reliability and validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.