Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35119477›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2023

Immediate Effects of Walking With a Knee Brace After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Structural Approach.

Alyssa Evans-Pickett, Hope C Davis-Wilson, Christopher D Johnston, J Troy Blackburn, Anthony C Hackney, Brian Pietrosimone

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bilateral waveform analysis of gait biomechanics presurgery to 12 months following ACL reconstruction compared to controls.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alyssa Evans-PickettMOTION Science Institute, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Hope C Davis-WilsonMOTION Science Institute, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Christopher D JohnstonMOTION Science Institute, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Troy BlackburnMOTION Science Institute, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Anthony C HackneyMOTION Science Institute, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Brian PietrosimoneMOTION Science Institute, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIndividuals who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at higher risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Altered joint tissue loading caused by aberrant gait biomechanics leads to deleterious changes in joint health linked to the onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Knee braces have been used to modify joint tissue loading in individuals with joint injury, yet the effects of walking with a brace after ACLR on biomechanical, biochemical, and structural cartilage outcomes are unknown.

objectiveTo compare biomechanical, biochemical, and structural outcomes between braced and nonbraced walking in individuals with ACLR.

designCrossover study.

settingResearch laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsA total of 34 individuals with unilateral ACLR (18 females, 16 males; time since ACLR = 50.1 ± 36.8 months). INTERVENTION(S): Gait biomechanics were assessed during braced and unbraced conditions on separate days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Vertical ground reaction force, knee-flexion angle, and internal knee-extension moment waveforms were evaluated throughout the stance phase and compared between conditions. Percentage changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (%ΔCOMP) and femoral cartilage cross-sectional area (%ΔCSA) measured via ultrasound were calculated after a 3000-step walking protocol.

resultsBraced walking increased the knee-flexion angle (largest difference = 3.56°; Cohen d effect size = 1.72) and knee-extension moment (largest difference = -0.48% body weight × height; Cohen d effect size = -1.14) compared with nonbraced walking but did not influence vertical ground reaction force. Whereas no difference (P = .20) in %ΔCOMP existed between the braced and nonbraced conditions in the entire cohort (n = 30 with complete blood data), a larger increase (P = .04) in %ΔCOMP was seen during nonbraced than braced walking in individuals who demonstrated increased COMP during nonbraced walking. No difference (P = .86) in %ΔCSA was present between the braced and nonbraced conditions.

conclusionsBraced walking may improve sagittal-plane gait biomechanics and %ΔCOMP in a subset of individuals who demonstrate a typical increased COMP response to load (ie, increase in COMP) after nonbraced walking.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionOsteoarthritis, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaCross-Over StudiesFemaleGaitHumansKnee JointMaleWalkingcartilage oligomeric matrix proteinknee-extension momentknee-flexion anglestiffened-knee gait strategyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35119477
PMCPMC10496450
OpenAlexW4210309237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.