ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2022
A novel chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) system using an exogenous protease, in which activation of T cells is controlled by expression patterns of cell‑surface proteins on target cells.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A CAR/CD19 Jurkat cell model for bioprocess screening and expansion: potential use for CAR-T cells production.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Design and preclinical testing of an anti-CD41 CAR T cell for the treatment of acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti‑CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‑T cell therapy against refractory B‑cell malignancies shows excellent therapeutic effects. However, there are some obstacles to be overcome in this treatment. Since current CAR‑T cells target a single cell‑surface protein on tumor cells, the CAR‑T cells also attack normal cells expressing the protein. This is one of the major adverse effects of this therapy. To improve target‑cell‑specificity of this therapy, we established a novel CAR system, in which T‑cell activation was controlled by expression patterns of proteins on target cells. Our novel CAR‑T cells had two distinct CARs consisting of a 'Signal‑CAR', recognizing a protein on tumor cells, and a 'Scissors‑CAR', recognizing another protein on normal cells. The signal‑CAR had a peptide sequence which was cleaved by the Scissors‑CAR, and functional domains for cellular activation. The Scissors‑CAR had a protease domain that cleaved its recognition peptide sequence in the Signal‑CAR. When tumor cells expressed only the protein recognized by the Signal‑CAR, the tumor cells were attacked. By contrast, normal cells expressing both the proteins induced inactivation of the Signal‑CAR through cleavage of the recognition site when getting in contact with the CAR‑T cells. To establish this system, we invented a Scissors‑CAR that was dominantly localized on cell membranes and was activated only when the CAR‑T cells were in contact with the normal cells. Using a T‑cell line, Jurkat, and two proteins, CD19 and HER2, as target proteins, we showed that the anti‑CD19‑Signal‑CAR was cleaved by the anti‑HER2‑Scissors‑CAR when the CAR‑T cells were co‑cultivated with cells expressing both the proteins, CD19 and HER2. Furthermore, we demonstrated that primary CAR‑T cells expressing both the CARs showed attenuated cytotoxicity againsT cells with both the target proteins. Our novel system would improve safety of the CAR‑T cell therapy, leading to expansion of treatable diseases by this immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.