Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35119077›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2022

Doxorubicin sensitizes breast cancer cells to natural killer cells in connection with increased Fas receptors.

Nunghathai Sawasdee, Methichit Wattanapanitch, Nontaphat Thongsin, Nattaporn Phanthaphol, Chutipa Chiawpanit, Chanitra Thuwajit, Pa-Thai Yenchitsomanus, Aussara Panya

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Caffeine Modulates Cell Death and Telomerase Activity in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nunghathai SawasdeeSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Methichit WattanapanitchSiriraj Center for Regenerative Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Nontaphat ThongsinSiriraj Center for Regenerative Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Nattaporn PhanthapholSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Chutipa ChiawpanitDepartment of Biology, Industry and Medicine, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Chanitra ThuwajitDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Pa-Thai YenchitsomanusSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Aussara PanyaDepartment of Biology, Industry and Medicine, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THChiang Mai University · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women. Although standard treatments are successful in patients with BC diagnosed at an early stage, an alternative treatment is required for patients with advanced‑stage disease who do not respond to these treatments. The concept of using chemotherapy to sensitize cancer cells to become susceptible to immunotherapy was recently introduced and may be used as an alternative treatment for BC. The chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin has been reported to sensitize cancer cells; however, the efficacy to sensitize the solid spheroids, in addition to its underlying mechanism regarding how doxorubicin sensitizes BC, has not previously been explored. In the present study, the effectiveness of a combined treatment of doxorubicin and natural killer‑92 (NK‑92) cells against BC in either 2D or 3D spheroid models, and its association with Fas receptor (FasR) expression, was demonstrated. The BC (MCF7) cell line expressing a higher level of FasR was more sensitive to NK‑92 cell killing than the MDA‑MB‑231 cell line, which expressed a lower level of FasR. A sublethal dose of doxorubicin caused a significant improvement in NK cytotoxicity. Concordantly, a significant reduction in cell viability was observed in the doxorubicin‑treated MCF7 spheroids. Notably, flow cytometric analysis revealed significantly increased FasR expression in the MCF7 cells, suggesting the underlying sensitization mechanism of doxorubicin in BC was related to the FasR upregulation. The present findings supported the use of combined doxorubicin and NK immunotherapy in BC treatment.

Indexed as

Breast Neoplasmsfas ReceptorCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinFemaleHumansKiller Cells, NaturalMCF-7 CellsDoxorubicinfas Receptorbreast cancercombined chemotherapy‑immunotherapydoxorubicinimmunomodulation activityimmunotherapynatural killer cells

Identifiers

PMID35119077
PMCPMC8815410
OpenAlexW4213048561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.