Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118977›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2021

Current advances in neuromodulation techniques in urology practices: A review of literature.

Bulent Erol, Yavuz Onur Danacioglu, Kenneth M Peters

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06019091 (Optimal Frequency Used in Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06019091 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Optimal Frequency Used in Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Treating Pelvic Pain in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbany Medical CollegeRan2022 to 2024Enrolled75ConditionsChronic Pelvic PainArmsCompass Health TENS 3000, 3 mode Analog Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bulent ErolDepartment of Urology, _Istanbul Bahçeci Health Group, _Istanbul, Turkey.
Yavuz Onur DanaciogluDepartment of Urology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, _Istanbul, Turkey.
Kenneth M PetersDepartment of Urology, Oakland University Wm. Beaumont School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.
Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRNpistanbul Brain Hospital · TROakland University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulation has become a valid therapeutic option for patients with various lower urinary tract disorders. In clinical practice, the most used and recommended neuromodulation techniques are sacral neuromodulation (SNM), pudendal neuromodulation (PN), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). There are many theories concerning the mechanism of action of neuromodulation. Although SNM, PN, and PTNS show their activities through different nerve roots, all provide central and peripheral nervous system modulations. SNM has been approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), nonobstructive urinary retention, and fecal incontinence, while PTNS has been approved for OAB treatment. However, they are also used off-label in other urinary and nonurinary pelvic floor disorders, such as neurogenic lower urinary system disorder, interstitial cystitis, chronic pelvic pain, and sexual dysfunction. Minor and nonsurgical reversible complications are usually seen after neuromodulation techniques. In addition, in the last few years, there have been various developments in neuromodulation technology. Some of the examples of these developments are rechargeable batteries with wireless charging, improvements in programing, less invasive single-stage implantation in outpatient settings, and lower-cost new devices. We performed a literature search using Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google scholar databases in the English language from January 2010 to February 2021. We included reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective studies to evaluate the activities and reliability of SNM, PN, and PTNS and the developments in this area in the last decade based on the current literature.

Identifiers

PMID35118977
PMCPMC9612778
OpenAlexW4200375245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.