Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118975›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2021

A systematic review of non-HPV prognostic biomarkers used in penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Jessica Bowie, Sobha Singh, Ciaran O'Hanlon, Vishal Shiatis, Oliver Brunckhorst, Asif Muneer, Kamran Ahmed

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica BowieGuy's Campus, King's College London School of Bioscience Education, London, UK.
Sobha SinghGuy's Campus, King's College London School of Bioscience Education, London, UK.
Ciaran O'HanlonGuy's Campus, King's College London School of Bioscience Education, London, UK.
Vishal ShiatisGuy's Campus, King's College London School of Bioscience Education, London, UK.
Oliver BrunckhorstMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Asif MuneerDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK;Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK;NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Kamran AhmedMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK;Department of Urology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
King's College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GBKings Health Partners · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic indicator for patients with penile cancer. However, predicting which clinically node negative patients will harbor lymph node metastases remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of biomarkers p53, Ki-67, and SCCAg in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until 15 October 2020. Eligible studies were identified by three independent reviewers. Outcome measures included the presence of penile LNM and CSS. Extracted data were narratively synthesized with GRADE criteria utilized to evaluate the quality of evidence. In total, 999 articles were screened with 20 selected for inclusion. Studies reporting the use of p53 to predict LNM and CSS were rated as having the highest quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria, and the majority showed a positive association between p53 expression and LNM and CSS. All biomarkers and outcome combinations had at least one study showing a significant effect on predicting the outcome. However, studies were heterogeneous, and many reported nonsignificant effects. Identifying p53 overexpression may help one to identify patients at higher risks of LNM to be considered for early inguinal lymphadenectomy. There is contradictory and unreliable evidence for the prognostic value of Ki-67 and SCCAg in penile SCC for LNM and CSS. Larger studies are required with more rigorous methods and reports to improve the evidence base.

Identifiers

PMID35118975
PMCPMC9612776
OpenAlexW4200253642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.